Oscar Levi wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 06:22:47AM +0900, Ionutz Borcoman wrote:
> > James Troup wrote:
> > >
> > > Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > If I run this as root, how can I sign the package, as my pgp key was
> > > > created for my personal account.
> > >
>
On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 06:22:47AM +0900, Ionutz Borcoman wrote:
> James Troup wrote:
> >
> > Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > If I run this as root, how can I sign the package, as my pgp key was
> > > created for my personal account.
> >
> > sudo is your friend.
>
> sudo s
> "Ionutz" == Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ionutz> Hi, I am trying to package my first set of libs. I am
Ionutz> doing this from my account with fakeroot. The problem is
Ionutz> that this way, the process stops with the following error:
(ldconfig not found)
Have yo
James Troup wrote:
>
> Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If I run this as root, how can I sign the package, as my pgp key was
> > created for my personal account.
>
> sudo is your friend.
sudo says
Sorry, user borco is not allowed to execute "/sbin/ldconfig" as root on
borco-e
Ionutz Borcoman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I run this as root, how can I sign the package, as my pgp key was
> created for my personal account.
sudo is your friend.
--
James
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Ionutz Borcoman wrote:
> as the original Makefile runs ldconfig. How can I correct this ?
Just modify the Makefile so that it does not run ldconfig.
--
"f9a072977084bf277db216f33cb45100" (a truly random sig)
On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 03:19:46AM +0900, Ionutz Borcoman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to package my first set of libs. I am doing this from my
> account with fakeroot. The problem is that this way, the process stops
> with the following error:
>
> ldconfig /home/borco/debian-devel/vdk/vdk-0.5/d
On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> The upstream sources for xplot contain a pre-compiled i386 binary (in
> case users don't want to compile themselves). The binary is not relevant
> to Debian:
>
> $ ldd xplot
> libforms.so.0.81 => /usr/local/lib/libforms.so.0.81 (0x4000b000)
> Obviously, my xplot_1.18.orig.tar.gz file won't correspond
> exactly to upstream sources (it'll be smaller!), but that's okay
> too right?
I do not see a problem w/ this. As you said, the binaries have nothing to do
with us and may not even work correctly.
The upstream sources for xplot contain a pre-compiled i386 binary (in
case users don't want to compile themselves). The binary is not relevant
to Debian:
$ ldd xplot
libforms.so.0.81 => /usr/local/lib/libforms.so.0.81 (0x4000b000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libX11.so.6 (
Hi,
I am trying to package my first set of libs. I am doing this from my
account with fakeroot. The problem is that this way, the process stops
with the following error:
ldconfig /home/borco/debian-devel/vdk/vdk-0.5/debian/tmp/usr/lib/
make[2]: ldconfig: Command not found
make[2]: *** [install]
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> The problem i see is that they don't want it to become non-free, and i think
> this is ok for this package, altough i think that ocaml could be more used if
> it would become really non-free. lets start a discution with them about it,
> but
> keep in mind
Hi,
I want to package the VDK libs. But I have to take a decission: how to
make the dbg package.
The VDK, if compiled with "-g -DVDKDEBUG" can provide additional
information, like the activity of the garbage collector (gc), regardless
of statically or dynamically linkage. Also, dynamically linkin
13 matches
Mail list logo
