Are *.m4 files usually distributed in -dev packages, or are they only needed
for those who compile CVS apps?
- Forwarded message from Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
I think that is only an issue w/ CVS compilers. If so, not your problem. You
should NOT be shipping a imlib.m4 in your packa
James Troup wrote:
> Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Depends: gdk-imlib1, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u), libgtk1 (>= 1:1.0.6-2), libjpeg62,
> > libjpegg6a, \
>
> ^^
> > libpng2, libtiff3g, libun
The Imlib maintainer has given all Imlib using app maintainers a copy of Imlib
compiled w/ jpeg 62 for testing. Should be uploaded soon.
On 09-Nov-98 James Troup wrote:
> Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Depends: gdk-imlib1, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u), libgtk1 (>= 1:1.0.6-2), libjpeg62,
>
Mitch Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Depends: gdk-imlib1, libc6 (>= 2.0.7u), libgtk1 (>= 1:1.0.6-2), libjpeg62,
> libjpegg6a, \
^^
> libpng2, libtiff3g, libungif3g (>= 3.0-2) | giflib3g (>= 3
That would probably suffice, then - at least once slink becomes
stable... I'm afraid I don't know how difficult (or trivial) it would be
to use the slink images for installing hamm.
In any event, when I first put those images together I don't think that
the versions in slink were yet available.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>> > "MS" == Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>>
MS> Uff. What name would you propose? I will consist of four
MS> dpkg-divert statements.
>>
MS> All files are found at
MS> ftp:
Hello mentors,
Theres been alot of discussion lately about cluster maintainance, and from
what I see there is little co-ordination in facing this need. What I would
like to see is a more co-ordinated effort, and thus I was considering posting
the message I have appended below.
However, I'm fa
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, Eeek. I do not actually test the scripts for remote CVS
> operation (and I haven't done so for months now), since I have a
> local repository. Could you please do a bash -x /usr/bin/cvs-*
> and see if you can exactl
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 29 Oct 1998, James Troup wrote:
james> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
james>
james> > Any help/patch/comments?
james>
james> Help: Simply upload the orig.tar.gz manually.
james>
james> No, that's plain wro
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would like to know on which given package other packages depend.
>> (yes, this has been posted somewhere last month, but I cannot find
>> this)
> pkg-revdep from pkg-order.
O
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chris Leishman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 1998 at 11:14:48PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 1998 at 06:48:51PM +1100, Chris Leishman wrote: >
>> The postinst modifies the /etc/exports file to add a 2 lines as
>> follows
>>
>> I do
[Two in one here]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Buddha M.D. Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think it's really a wasted effort. There is a lot of
> information there, most of it is FAQ-material. Probably half of the
> questions asked in debian-mentors could be answered by it. Spr
One of my packages rev'd a level while I was waiting for
confirmation of maintainer status.
The new version of qiv can be found at:
http://blevins.simplenet.com/debian/qiv/
I assume that it is Okay since noone offered any criticisms of
the last version posted.
From the control file:
Package: qi
13 matches
Mail list logo
