will be to learn how to use git for the packaging!
Cheers,
Mahnu
[1] https://bugzilla-timc.imag.fr/show_bug.cgi?id=181 (this contains a
lot of reference to other people who seem to have this problem)
On 15/04/16 19:28, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:35:44PM +0100, Emm
ng with VTK_LEGACY_REMOVE defined.
VTK 6.3 is available from experimental.
Best,
Gert
--
Emmanuel Promayon, Maitre de conférences
Univ. Grenoble Alpes / Polytech Grenoble
Laboratoire TIMC-IMAG / équipe GMCAO
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 24/01/17 17:23, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 03:45:20PM +0100, Gert Wollny wrote:
On 24.01.2017 08:29, Andreas Tille wrote:
I have no idea whether its feasible nor whether it is a good idea to
bump itk to the latest upstream version but since I noticed the new
version right
Dear Hugo,
On 29/03/17 16:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Dear Hugo,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:54:45PM +0200, Hugo Talbot wrote:
Guillaume Paran (in cc.) and I are in charge of the SOFA consortium . This
consortium focus on the coordination of the developments, the animation of the
open-source com
Dear Hugo,
We are two engineers in the consortium, and we could find some time to
work on this project during the upcoming year. However, none of us
both has experienced on Debian packages.
The mentoring looks a nice way to start.
Emmanuel would you be a part of this project ?
I unfortunately
Dear all,
I am trying to package the new CamiTK release (release 4.1.0) and I
can't do it without a bit of help!
In upstream we are also using a local gitlab instance to host our
project (hosted on gricad-gitlab.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr).
We want to change the way the CamiTK debian package is l
Dear Andreas,
On 13/07/18 22:00, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 06:33:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
In upstream we are also using a local gitlab instance to host our project
(hosted on gricad-gitlab.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr).
As far as I know gitlab provides a
+0200
Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
Dear all,
I am trying to package the new CamiTK release (release 4.1.0) and I
can't do it without a bit of help!
In upstream we are also using a local gitlab instance to host our
project (hosted on gricad-gitlab.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr).
We want to change the wa
Dear all,
I patched the camitk package on salsa so that it only depends on VTK7,
this should fix the RC bug #909120.
I did not tag the master branch with the debian/4.1.2-2 tag, as I am not
100% sure that everything is valid.
Could someone check that I did not forget anything and tag+upload
Thanks!
On 23/10/2018 17:00, Andreas Tille wrote:
Uploaded, thanks for your work on this (no idea about future VTK versions)
Andreas.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:40:12PM +0200, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
Dear all,
I patched the camitk package on salsa so that it only depends on VTK7, this
Dear Paul,
Thank you for your investigation.
From the autopkgtest log [1], it seems that vtk6 is installed along
side vtk7.
My understanding of this problem is as follow (I put the debian-med list
in copy so that they can correct me if I am wrong)
- gdcm 2.8.7-1 depends on vtk6
- gdcm 2.8.7-
Dear Paul, Gert and all,
Thanks to the (great work) of Gert on vtk7 and gdcm packages, version
7.1.1+dfsg1-9 of vtk7 and version 2.8.8-2 of gdcm are now both in testing.
I sent a retry request for the autopkgtest of camitk version 4.1.2-2 but
it naturally failed as camitk 4.1.2-2 was built wit
Dear Mattia and Paul,
On 16/11/2018 11:08, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 07:28:21AM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
Thanks to the (great work) of Gert on vtk7 and gdcm packages, version
7.1.1+dfsg1-9 of vtk7 and version 2.8.8-2 of gdcm are now both in testing.
I sent a retry
Dear all
Thank to Paul for your answers about the autoremoval and explanation
about the ABI problem. It seems that Adrian Bunk's triage message in
909120 (added blocking bug(s) of 909120: 911793) did push the
autoremoval for another month (thanks to Adrian as well, as that's
exactly what is h
Hello,
I just committed some changes on the svn corresponding to the first two
points of my plan:
- rtfm (not finished, as I keep finding new things to read or to re-read)
- update upstream source tarball
- generate a separate libqtpropertybrowser package from the source tarball
All was going
Hello,
About the commit I did yesterday, I wanted to mention two remaining
lintian's warning (I forgot them in my joy of having something operational):
- camitk source: newer-standards-version 3.9.4 (current is 3.9.3)
- libcamitk3 binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames (this one is
override
Sounds good so far. I have spotted some lintian info which is not
dramatically but I stumbled the first time about it (you need
`lintian -I`)
I: libcamitk3-data: duplicated-compressed-file
usr/share/camitk-3.0/testdata/BigEndianCompressed.img.gz N: N:
The given, apparently compressed, file is sh
Thank you Andreas,
Feel free to ignore (you need to use lintian from unstable which
knows the latest standard-version). Ignoring this is perfectly
fine.
Ok
- libcamitk3 binary: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames (this one is
overriden)
That's OK.
Good.
1) Concerning the first warning: I
Ok. I just modified both entries as UNRELEASED (policy are to be respected!)
:-)
But forgot to commit! Done now.
No, there is no problem with frequent uploads. Just try to decide what
is in the best interest of your users (which you know way better then
me.)
I suppose then the best would be
Hello,
On 16/02/13 21:05, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 11:16:55AM +0100, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
Ok. I just modified both entries as UNRELEASED (policy are to be respected!)
But forgot to commit! Done now.
I admit I reverted the idea to leave the unreleased
Hi everyone,
Furthermore I would like to mention another page[3] with lots of information
about Debian Med packages. Besides the list of RC bugs you can also
see packages that can not be built on a Debian architecture,
packages that are not allowed to migrate from unstable to testing
(and thus w
regards
Andreas.
--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7
smime.p7s
Descripti
, can you confirm this is ok, and maybe close the bug?
If this really is a bug, I am willing to help!
Best regards,
Mahnu
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/v/vtk.html
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=731823
--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525
package during our presentation at the
LSM2012. Without this we would probably had a very long steep learning
curve! Thumbs up.
Best regards,
Mahnu
--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté d
?
Best regards,
Mahnu
--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7
smime.p7s
Descripti
Dear Andreas,
Nicolas and I worked on packaging the new CamiTK release (3.4.0).
We are hoping this version could be in testing before the jessie freeze
deadline. This CamiTK release has a much better test suite (with over
190 integration tests), which improves the QA compared to the previous
Hello to all,
after the brilliant presentation of Andreas Tille and Mathieu Malaterre
at LSM 2012 in Geneva, we (the CamiTK - small - development team) are
contacting you to see if it could be desirable/possible to include
CamiTK (http://camitk.imag.fr) in debian-med.
We were unfortunately n
M
Ps: do you have an alioth account ?
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuel Promayon
wrote:
Hello to all,
after the brilliant presentation of Andreas Tille and Mathieu Malaterre at
LSM 2012 in Geneva, we (the CamiTK - small - development team) are
contacting you to see if it could be desirable
Dear Andreas,
Thank you again for your quick answer and further tests.
> It should also work perfectly well to make the last upstream version (5.0.2)
> build properly. Andreas started to check on last month but with your patch,
> it should work.
> I can confirm anyway that camitk version 5.0.2
Dear Andreas,
I managed to get the package to build (and not just the binaries!) and
autopkgtest to run without error.
I just pushed the required modification and two patches.
Note that I had to use sed in d/rules for override_dh_auto_configure,
hope that's ok.
Lintian still generates the fo
Thanks a lot again for your help, detailed answers and upload!
Best regards,
Emmanuel
On 09/02/2022 12:00, Andreas Tille wrote:
Dear Emmanuel,
Am Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 10:28:13AM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon:
I managed to get the package to build (and not just the binaries!) and
On 16/02/2022 22:10, Andreas Tille wrote:
camitk was accepted and I have done a source-only upload.
Thank you very much for cleaning up the copyright entry detected by
Thorsten!
I noticed that there are some build problems (and that's another
obstacle on gazebo's road up to testing!).
It all seems to be link with the architecture configuration in d/c,
but I am not sure of what is to be done exactly to clean it up.
Any help would be appreciated!
After some digging, it seems that the problem was not due to anything
being wrong in d/c.
I think I managed to solve it by a) forc
Hello Andreas,
Thanks a lot to you for your answer (packaging is still/always a
challenge for me!) and the upload.
Best regards,
Emmanuel
On 25/02/2022 06:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 02:58:15PM +0100 schrieb Emmanuel Promayon:
I am not sure if that is the
ad if everything seems correct?
Thank you in advance for your feedback and all your help along the way.
Best regards,
Emmanuel
--
Emmanuel Promayon
Professeur Univ. Grenoble Alpes - Polytech Grenoble
Laboratoire TIMC - équipe GMCAO
Dear Pierre,
On 25/08/2023 22:46, Pierre Gruet wrote:
Sorry, it seems your questions have remained unanswered for quite some
time. Vacations, summer, ...!
No problem at all, vacations is really important!
On my setup, everything seems to be ready for upload, but I did not
tag the master br
Dear Étienne
Thanks! That might also have solved/positively affected bug #1056953, no
(probably requires a rebuild of camitk too)?
Best regards
On 05/12/2023 00:24, Étienne Mollier wrote:
Hi,
Still counting for December 4th if counting from UTC+, I
fixed two minor cases of double source
Dear all,
First of all, I'd like to wish the whole team a great sprint in Berlin.
As far as CamiTK is concerned, version 5.2.0 has been released upstream
and I have updated the package on salsa.
I did not tag the master branch with the debian/5.2.0 tag, as I am not
100% sure that everything is
Dear all,
I hope you had a great sprint (seems a lot was done, congrats!).
I was wondering if any of you had any time to check the new CamiTK
version package in between all of the bug fixing and python transition?
Best regards,
Emmanuel
On 16/02/2024 11:01, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
Dear
Dear Andreas,
Thank for your time, patience and explanations!
Hmmm, sorry, no. If you check that branch[1] you see the names for the
two last releases are the original download names with camel case letters,
a '-' instead of '_' separating the name and the version and lacking the
'.orig' string
Dear Andreas,
Thank you very much for checking the package and uploading it.
Thank you very much for the explanation, the wiki update and the link to
routine-update, that will probably my saviour in the future!
Routine-update is saving me a lot of time and I hope it will do so
for others. ;-)
anuel,
Étienne Mollier, on 2025-03-25:
I reviewed your changes to camitk and am preparing them for
sponsored upload.
Now they're actually uploaded.
Thank you for your contribution!
Have a nice day, :)
--
Emmanuel Promayon
Professeur Grenoble INP - Univ. Grenoble Alpes
Polytech Grenoble &am
Dear all,
We detected an issue with the current camitk package (this issue might
have been present since quite a while in fact but went unnoticed).
After installing camitk-config, on a fresh sid, running camitk-config
displays the following error:
$ camitk-config
camitk-config: error while lo
Hello to all,
I forgot to ask: should I first file a bug to explain the problem and
then reference it as closed in d/changelog?
Thanks in advance for your help (and understanding of a noob maintainer!)
Emmanuel
On 15/03/2025 15:17, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
Dear all,
We detected an issue
44 matches
Mail list logo
