Re: Import of debian med packages metadata to Tools Platform Ecosystem

On 25.07.20 22:49, Hervé Ménager wrote: > Hi Steffen, Andreas, > > - Thanks for the clarification regarding the mirror. I thought there > was a mirror because I read this in the edam.sh comment: > " > This script lives on > > https://salsa.debian.org/blends-team/website/commits/master/misc/sql/ed

Re: quast - should this be uploaded?

On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 02:56:09PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > Ah - thanks! Seems like something is wrong with the busco package, then. But busco does not feature busco.py (I checked this). > d/changelog mentions a d/TODO - do you have this uncommitted on your > end, possibly? I was wonderin

Attributions concern for aparapi (currently in NEW)

Hi, I just realized there was a strange paragraph in the ATTRIBUTIONS.md file in libaparapi-java root folder : https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libaparapi-java/-/blob/master/ATTRIBUTIONS.md It seems to be restrictive and perhaps annoying for us. Afterwards I saw that Andreas had already rais

[RFS] prime-philo

Hi, I've fixed gcc-10 FTBFS for prime-philo as reported here in #957708. builds with passing tests. I've pushed my changes to the team-repo[1] Please: gbp clone --pristine-tar https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/prime-philo OR Grant DM access: PGP key fingerprint: 3E99A526F5DCC0CBBF1CEEA600BAE74B3

Re: Attributions concern for aparapi (currently in NEW)

Hi Pierre, On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 04:13:41PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: > I just realized there was a strange paragraph in the ATTRIBUTIONS.md > file in libaparapi-java root folder : > > https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/libaparapi-java/-/blob/master/ATTRIBUTIONS.md > > It seems to be restricti

Re: [RFS] prime-philo

Allowed. On 26.07.20 16:41, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > I've fixed gcc-10 FTBFS for prime-philo as reported here in #957708. > builds with passing tests. > I've pushed my changes to the team-repo[1] > Please: > > gbp clone --pristine-tar https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/prime-philo >

About Snpeff packaging (Was : Re: Attributions concern for aparapi (currently in NEW))

Hi Andreas, Le 26/07/2020 à 17:22, Andreas Tille a écrit : > Hi Pierre, > >> >> https://github.com/aparapi/aparapi/issues/50 > > I've pinged that issue. > Thanks! > >> Yet I packaged libaparapi-java and we sent it in NEW, where it currently >> lies. Sorry for not seeing it before. > > Well,

Re: About Snpeff packaging (Was : Re: Attributions concern for aparapi (currently in NEW))

Hi Pierre, On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:07:24PM +0200, Pierre Gruet wrote: > Le 26/07/2020 à 17:22, Andreas Tille a écrit : > >> https://github.com/aparapi/aparapi/issues/50 > > > > I've pinged that issue. > > Thanks! You are more than welcome. Its just supporting your attempt which is helping t

RF peer review: DYNAMIC

Heya, This goes to Andreas in particular, upstream has addressed their test issues - the problem was with the tests. They also kindly issued a release tag for the first version, but not for the now fixed one, so we now have 1.0~alpha.1+2020072524git5390b6c , which I find amusingly long. And amusin