Hi Erik,
could you please confirm that you are interested in finding a sponsor
for your work? As I said the Debian Med team is really interested. In
case you have some time constraints or whatever I'd volunteer to commit
your work to our Vcs (please specify whether you prefer Git or SVN) and
wil
Hi Tomás,
because we started the MoM project here on the Debian Med list I'm
quoting the last message about your MoM package (which actually was on
the python-modules list) here and wonder whether you could give some
status update. It would be great if you would give some succcess /
failure / blo
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:49:19PM -0500, Carlos Borroto a écrit :
>>
>> I recently switch my desktop to Debian Testing and now I get this
>> error when trying to pack for Ubuntu:
>> E: snappy1.0.3-java changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-fi
Le 6 déc. 2012 à 02:56, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:49:19PM -0500, Carlos Borroto a écrit :
>>
>> I recently switch my desktop to Debian Testing and now I get this
>> error when trying to pack for Ubuntu:
>> E: snappy1.0.3-java changes: bad-distribution-in-changes-file
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Eric Maeker wrote:
>
> Le 6 déc. 2012 à 02:56, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
>> Le Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:49:19PM -0500, Carlos Borroto a écrit :
>>>
>>> I recently switch my desktop to Debian Testing and now I get this
>>> error when trying to pack for Ubuntu:
>>> E
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:54:11PM -0500, Carlos Borroto wrote:
> I always like to build
> locally first to be sure I'm not uploading broken packages to
> LaunchPad. I found it saves tons of time.
+1
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Any volunteer to test the lintian clean package with some real data
> before I upload? Steffen?
>
Hi Andreas,
I'm interested in testing fastqc. This is my second time dealing with
a debian package in svn and my second miserably fail.
Thi
Greets, Andreas. Sorry for going silent for so long.
So, I've finally been able to get a grasp on both DEP8 testing and the
Python3 version. I'm sure there are many new details to fix, but
everything seems well underway. The tests are executed correctly, and
the Python3 version installs and works
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Med group
* Package name: python3-csb
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Michael Habeck
* URL : http://csb.codeplex.com/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python framework for structura
Hi Carlos,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 04:16:32PM -0500, Carlos Borroto wrote:
> > Any volunteer to test the lintian clean package with some real data
> > before I upload? Steffen?
>
> I'm interested in testing fastqc. This is my second time dealing with
> a debian package in svn and my second miser
Hi Tomás,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 10:40:43PM +0100, Tomás Di Domenico wrote:
> So, I've finally been able to get a grasp on both DEP8 testing and the
> Python3 version. I'm sure there are many new details to fix, but
> everything seems well underway. The tests are executed correctly, and
> the Pyt
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> In short:
>
>1. use uscan from
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/tille/devscripts.git;a=blob;f=scripts/uscan.pl;hb=HEAD
> to get the original tarball I used
>2. if this fails please send full build log (or mak
Hi,
feel free to read
http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002802
I just sended the authors the following remark via G+:
I like your ten simple rules. What I'm missing in rule 7 and/or 8 is
the idea that you should try to get your software included into
[Steffen: Please read last paragraph about moving fastqc from SVN to Git]
Hi Carlos,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:59:35PM -0500, Carlos Borroto wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > In short:
> >
> >1. use uscan from
> >
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/
14 matches
Mail list logo
