[Steffen: Please read last paragraph about moving fastqc from SVN to Git] Hi Carlos,
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:59:35PM -0500, Carlos Borroto wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > > In short: > > > > 1. use uscan from > > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/tille/devscripts.git;a=blob;f=scripts/uscan.pl;hb=HEAD > > to get the original tarball I used > > 2. if this fails please send full build log (or make it accessible > > somewhere > > 3. lets consider using Git if problems remain > > > > Thanks for working on this > > This did the trick. I was able to build this package after using the > new uscan, totally didn't read the comment inside debian/rules before. That's definitely not your fault. Its actually a bit wacky idea of mine to rely on not yet published features but I somehow feel three arguments on my side: 1. Using the new uscan here makes it more popular 2. By doing so it gets more testers 3. Things become so brain dead simple that it would be a real waste of time to write explicite code to remove stuff from tarballs > I'll be testing the resulting binary with real data tomorrow. I'll > share the results. That's great. > Regarding migrating to git, I would love if that's the case. I managed > to write down a nice workflow[1] for updating git packages and for > submitting then to launchpad. It takes me almost no time in most case. > I will be using fastqc often enough that I would be happy to help > keeping it updated. Steffen, would you agree upon a move of fastqc SVN to Git? Kind regards Andreas. > [1]https://docs.google.com/document/d/17rlBfHLLrVwL20eptZGyRkrrIZslsvmiZukjZWSqa1M/edit -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121207072543.gb19...@an3as.eu
