On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Would you consider to create a bamtools-tools (well, this sounds like a
> stupid name - perhaps only bam-tools or bamtools-utils - whatever might
> sound intuitive to you) package? For similarity issues I checked samtools
> which is formal
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:01:04AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> > Would you consider to create a bamtools-tools (well, this sounds like a
> > stupid name - perhaps only bam-tools or bamtools-utils - whatever might
> > sound intuitive to you) package? For similarity issues I checked sa
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:01:04AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> > > Would you consider to create a bamtools-tools (well, this sounds like a
> > > stupid name - perhaps only bam-tools or bamtools-utils - whatever might
> > > so
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:33:03AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> >
> > So the last remaining questions are:
> >
> >1. Can we fix the pristine-tar branch properly (to exclude third_party)
> > or would it possibly less work to recreate the Git repository (I
> > personally would
Hi Charles,
I noticed that Velvet is now in Git and it has a more recent change than
the packaging in SVN. If this is a definite move I'd welcome if you
would remove velvet from SVN (and drop a README.status as for the other
moved packages). If you have time constraints just confirm and I'll
do
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:33:03AM -0500, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> > >
> > > So the last remaining questions are:
> > >
> > >1. Can we fix the pristine-tar branch properly (to exclude
> third_party)
> > > or would it possibly
6 matches
Mail list logo
