On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> > Would you consider to create a bamtools-tools (well, this sounds like a > stupid name - perhaps only bam-tools or bamtools-utils - whatever might > sound intuitive to you) package? For similarity issues I checked samtools > which is formally lacking the libsamtools<version> package - but it also > does not contain a *.so dynamic library. > > I just added the binary package bamtools. This is what a user would install. -Dominique
