Hi,
I just sent a patch for the sofa-framework issue #588278.
It seems to work on my side.
I did not updated SVN as I am not the maintainer of the software and it
seems that Andreas is working on package (as per a previous email).
Olivier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.d
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:00:23AM +0100, olivier.sallou wrote:
> I just sent a patch for the sofa-framework issue #588278.
Cool, thanks.
> It seems to work on my side.
>
> I did not updated SVN as I am not the maintainer of the software and it
> seems that Andreas is working on package (as per
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 07:33:33AM +0100, Eric MAEKER wrote:
> > There is obviosely some trouble in the Qt3 compatibility layer.
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I've took a **very quick** look at the code. I believe that
>
> sofa-1.0-rc1/applications/projects/Modeler/exec/exec.pro
>
> is mi
Le 12/29/11 10:30 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:00:23AM +0100, olivier.sallou wrote:
>> I just sent a patch for the sofa-framework issue #588278.
> Cool, thanks.
>
>> It seems to work on my side.
>>
>> I did not updated SVN as I am not the maintainer of the software a
Le 12/29/11 10:30 AM, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:00:23AM +0100, olivier.sallou wrote:
>> I just sent a patch for the sofa-framework issue #588278.
> Cool, thanks.
>
>> It seems to work on my side.
>>
>> I did not updated SVN as I am not the maintainer of the software a
Hi,
As a way of getting familiar with git-buildpackage and company. I have
been trying to clone several packages git repository and getting them
onto the PPA. I was able to do so for samtools, only for Oneiric as I
feel safer staying out of Lucid LTS until I gain more experience. I
created a new b
Hi Yaroslav,
Indeed, I misunderestimated build-depends, now corrected. Strange
that debuild did not complain about unsatisfied build dependencies,
contrary to what `debuild --help` says ("option -D enabled by
default"). After passing -D explicitly to debuild, I was able to sort
this one out.
Hu
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, andrei zavada wrote:
> Indeed, I misunderestimated build-depends, now corrected. Strange
> that debuild did not complain about unsatisfied build dependencies,
> contrary to what `debuild --help` says ("option -D enabled by
> default"). After passing -D explicitly to debuild,
8 matches
Mail list logo