Current status packaging GT.M ? (Was: Status packaging GT.M? (Was: OpenVista for Ubuntu))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Bhaskar, On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:16:28AM -0500, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > > GT.M - Rock solid. Lightning fast. Secure. No compromises. We want this for Debian. No compromises. :-) So this is just a ping about current status. > The current install script is designed for interactive use and pro

Status of OpenMRS packaging (Was: Packages required for trunk build of OpenMRS with MavenBuilder - next steps?)

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Misha, On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 05:53:30PM -0600, Misha Koshelev wrote: > ... > (long story about packaging shortened) I remember that there were some reasons to on one hand wait for a new OpenMRS version and on the other hand wait for the Squeeze release. Can you please give us an update about

Fwd: Re: [Gnumed-devel] dob bug

2011-03-17 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
Does it make sense to add cups-pdf (see below) to the dependencies for gnumed- client ? Sebastian -- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -- Betreff: Re: [Gnumed-devel] dob bug Datum: Mittwoch, 16. März 2011, 12:23:25 Von: vban...@gmail.com An: Sebastian Hilbert if you use write docum

Re: Fwd: Re: [Gnumed-devel] dob bug

2011-03-17 Thread Karsten Hilbert
@vbanait: thanks for sticking with us and reporting the problems you encounter On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:49:10AM +0100, Hilbert, Sebastian wrote: > Does it make sense to add cups-pdf (see below) to the dependencies for gnumed- > client ? Certainly not as a dependancy. This is strange anyways, s

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 0.9 release plan

2011-03-17 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:07:52AM +0100, Hilbert, Sebastian wrote: > It is feature packed from what I can see. > > Interaction with FreeDiams for prescriptions > interaction with arriba for myocardial prevention counseling > free text forms/reports > printing of encounters for e.g. discharge let

Re: [Gnumed-devel] dob bug

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:05:11AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > Does it make sense to add cups-pdf (see below) to the dependencies for > > gnumed- > > client ? General remark: We as the packagers trust your experience as author + user whether something makes sense to add or not. I would def

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 0.9 release plan

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:16:00AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > in the pipeline: > > xml-rpc support for Ginkgo-CADx Dicom viewer (yeah) > > For which to become a truly grand option it would be > tremendously helpful if it got packaged for Debian. Did upstream answered the question about the

Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I just wanted to give a ping about the status of InVesalius. It seems that sigar did not made some progress (at least I can not find it in Debian). Can you please give an update whether some help is needed or what issues are open? Kind regards Andreas. On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 03:2

Re: [Gnumed-devel] dob bug

2011-03-17 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:31:25AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > GNUmed calls gm-print_doc which in turn calls either > > kprinter (does not exist anymore) or gtklp. The latter in > > turn is a GUI for CUPS based file printing. > > Does anybody know a replacement for kprinter? This would be >

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 0.9 release plan

2011-03-17 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:33:19AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > in the pipeline: > > > xml-rpc support for Ginkgo-CADx Dicom viewer (yeah) > > > > For which to become a truly grand option it would be > > tremendously helpful if it got packaged for Debian. > > Did upstream answered the quest

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 0.9 release plan

2011-03-17 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
Am Donnerstag, 17. März 2011, 11:33:19 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:16:00AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > > in the pipeline: > > > xml-rpc support for Ginkgo-CADx Dicom viewer (yeah) > > > > For which to become a truly grand option it would be > > tremendously helpful if

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, Hi Andreas, > I just wanted to give a ping about the status of InVesalius.  It seems > that sigar did not made some progress (at least I can not find it in > Debian).  Can you please give an update whether some help is needed or > what

Re: ensembl_57-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2011-03-17 Thread William Spooner
Great! Thanks for all your efforts regarding this Steffen. All the best, Will On 16 Mar 2011, at 10:37, Steffen Möller wrote: > Dear all, > > we can be very happy to now have Ensembl in our distribution. It is in > experimental since it depends on other packages that are still in > experimenta

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Michael Hanke
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > So I would really love to push this a bit. For the future: If a > sponsor / mentor finds problems like those you mentioned above in a > package and you have no idea how to proceed - just ask here. We are > interested to move these

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:08:54AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > > I was in touch with Michael Hanke some months ago about sigar > packaging. Acording to him, these were the problems: > > - build dependency 'ant' seems to be missing ?? $ LANG=en apt-cache policy ant | head -n 2 ant:

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:39:57AM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > So I would really love to push this a bit. For the future: If a > > sponsor / mentor finds problems like those you mentioned above in a > > package and you have no i

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Michael Hanke
Forgot this one: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > But the other problems I > > haven't seen yet. Michael Hanke created a branch in github to do the > > sigar packaging (https://github.com/hanke/sigar/tree/debian) and I > > forked that (https://github.com/tfmoraes/

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Michael Hanke
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:52:40PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I think the issue here is lack of time, all those things are trivial to > > fix -- just nobody has gotten to it yet. > > Fine. Is there enough time to move the git repository somewhere at > debian.org? If yes I might have a look.

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I tried git clone git://github.com/hanke/sigar.git but there is no debian/ dir in the repository. Am I missing something? On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:54:04AM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote: > > Upstream has sigar on github. It felt good to stay close to upstream -- > collaborative work on g

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Michael Hanke
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 03:23:17PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I tried > >git clone git://github.com/hanke/sigar.git > > but there is no debian/ dir in the repository. Am I missing something? After cloning you are in the 'default' branch -- in this case master. The debian packagi

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 09:08:54AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> >> I was in touch with Michael Hanke some months ago about sigar >> packaging. Acording to him, these were the problems: >> >> - build dependency 'ant' seems to

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > Ah, that was my fault. I was only trying to package the java binding, > only tests. I just forget to put ant in dependencies. OK. > >> - changelog doesn't list ITP bug number > > > > You should file a bug report against the

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-17 Thread Adit Panchal
Here is a copy of the latest source: http://dicompyler.googlecode.com/files/dicompyler-0.4a1.tgz The project is executed via main.py and the requirements are stated as before: http://code.google.com/p/dicompyler/wiki/BuildRequirements Let me know if there is anything I need to change. Thanks! A

Bug#618689: ITP: squizz bioinformatics sequence converter tool

2011-03-17 Thread Olivier Sallou
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-med@lists.debian.org Maintainer: Olivier Sallou Language: C License: GNU v2 Upstream Author: Nicolas Joly Homepage: ftp://ftp.pasteur.fr/pub/gensoft/projects/squizz/ Description: Squizz is a sequence/alignment format checker, but it has so

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0300, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: >> Ah, that was my fault. I was only trying to package the java binding, >> only tests. I just forget to put ant in dependencies. > > OK. > >> >> - changelog doesn't list

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:10:27AM -0500, Adit Panchal wrote: > Here is a copy of the latest source: > http://dicompyler.googlecode.com/files/dicompyler-0.4a1.tgz Thanks. Could you please verify that everything is inside this tarball. It looks a bit sparse compared to the content of the repositor

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Thiago Franco Moraes
Ah, I've done some modifications in the copyright and changelog https://github.com/tfmoraes/sigar/tree/debian/debian On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Thiago Franco Moraes wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0300, Thiago Franco Mo

Re: Bug#618689: ITP: squizz bioinformatics sequence converter tool

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Olivier, thanks for keeping us informed - tasks page will be updated after next cron run Andreas. On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:56:23PM +0100, Olivier Sallou wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-med@lists.debian.org > > Maintainer: Olivier Sallou > Language: C >

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 0.9 release plan

2011-03-17 Thread Sebastian Hilbert
Am Donnerstag, 17. März 2011, 11:33:19 schrieb Andreas Tille: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:16:00AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote: > > > in the pipeline: > > > xml-rpc support for Ginkgo-CADx Dicom viewer (yeah) > > > > For which to become a truly grand option it would be > > tremendously helpful if

Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 0.9 release plan

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:53:43PM +0100, Sebastian Hilbert wrote: > Good news. I was told that they are reworking their build system to make it > easier for packagers. They are actively looking into getting the patches > worked out That's really good news. > Supposedly most wx issues have bee

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:50:34AM -0400, Michael Hanke wrote: > > After cloning you are in the 'default' branch -- in this case master. > The debian packaging is in the 'debian' branch (see below for reason). > To get there: > > git checkout -b debian origin/debian I did and verified: $ git

Re: Status of InVesalius packaging (Was: Status of SIGAR (Was: InVesalius packaging))

2011-03-17 Thread Karsten Hilbert
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:38:47PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > the "source". That works great as long as you have them. Many projects > > on github don't have them. github offers a mechanism that produces > > tarballs for every tag in the repository. making a release is as simple > > as 'git t

Re: Any software package for Radiation Oncology Contouring?

2011-03-17 Thread Adit Panchal
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 13:38, Andreas Tille wrote: > Thanks.  Could you please verify that everything is inside this tarball. > It looks a bit sparse compared to the content of the repository.  Meanwhile > I commited some basic stuff regarding a Debian package into > >  svn://svn.debian.org/svn/d