Forgot this one: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:30:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > But the other problems I > > haven't seen yet. Michael Hanke created a branch in github to do the > > sigar packaging (https://github.com/hanke/sigar/tree/debian) and I > > forked that (https://github.com/tfmoraes/sigar/tree/debian), but I > > didn't have time to work in it. > > Is there any reason not to use > > git.debian.org/git/debian-med/sigar > > (or any other location at git.debian.org because it is not really Debian > Med centric)? I mean finally it does not matter where the repository is > located but having everything Debian packaging related at debian.org > makes perfectly sense to me (and BTW has actual technical advantages for > me personally).
Upstream has sigar on github. It felt good to stay close to upstream -- collaborative work on github is much more efficient than on alioth. That being said, I also prefer to have the vcs settings in debian/control point to alioth and pushing to two remote repos is simple and allows working with both ends without compromise. Michael -- Michael Hanke http://mih.voxindeserto.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110317135404.GA15461@meiner
