Re: Connecting those interested in getting GT.M into the Debian repositories

Hi Andreas, Per your suggestion, I read the Debian Med Policy, and I've also spent several hours reading through chunks (but not all) of the "New Maintainer's Guide," the "Debian Policy," and the "Developer's Reference." What I learned is that I have a lot to learn (and a lot to read)! Alth

Re: Connecting those interested in getting GT.M into the Debian repositories

Hi Andreas, Sorry -- I just solved the login issue. I am now a guest member of Alioth. Alan On 08/30/2010 06:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Alan, thanks for the more detailed explanation. On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 05:38:06PM -0400, Alan O'Neill wrote: Hi Andreas, To explain further abou

Re: Hi! I am new, I would appreciate some direction

On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:07:36AM +0300, George Marselis wrote: > > Obligation is probably the wrong word.  It just makes sense to subscribe > > this mailing list.  IMHO the best way to start in the Debian Med team is > > to read the Debian Med policy document[1] first. > > done. Great. > spea

Re: Connecting those interested in getting GT.M into the Debian repositories

On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 01:16:06PM -0400, Alan O'Neill wrote: > I'm certainly still interested in helping to get GT.M into the stream, > but I'm feeling a little overwhelmed with what seem to be the > requirements. We are here to help you overcoming the feeling of beeing overwhelmed. > I like

Re: Bug#592721: unblock: embassy-* and emboss.

Le Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 06:50:03PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 01:12:20 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Just remove the embassy packages. This is a perfectly acceptable solution > > that > > I accepted in advance in the first email of this thread. > > > That's no