Le Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 06:50:03PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 01:12:20 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Just remove the embassy packages. This is a perfectly acceptable solution > > that > > I accepted in advance in the first email of this thread. > > > That's not going to fix emboss. Are you going to fix that one, or > should it get removed as well?
I can prepare an update to add Breaks in emboss-lib, libajax6 and libnucleus6 in Squeeze, to open the way to a safe removal of the embassy pakcages. But EMBOSS 6.1 is an obsolete upstream version. The package in Sid is by all means superior, and does not need a Breaks declaration unless we would like to support the use of a mixture of Lenny and Squeeze. I understand that there is the freeze, but let's be practical and take the solution that needs the least work for both of us, and which will bring to our users an up-to-date version of EMBOSS. This version was released less than a month before the freeze, but is the current stable version, the only one to be supported upstream. If you were thinking about other release-critical issues, please open a bug so that our discussion can be more concrete. -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100905002213.ga4...@merveille.plessy.net
