Hi Maarten,
Maarten L. Hekkelman, on 2024-10-31:
> Op 30-10-2024 om 20:42 schreef Étienne Mollier:
> > despite the incomplete subset, it allows the
> > test to pass, allowing the python-biopython build to go through.
> > I should be able to upload a fix shortly. 🙂
> If you bundle your own mini-cc
Hi Étienne,
Op 30-10-2024 om 20:42 schreef Étienne Mollier:
despite the incomplete subset, it allows the
test to pass, allowing the python-biopython build to go through.
I should be able to upload a fix shortly. 🙂
If you bundle your own mini-ccd file, you could fix the warning by
copying the S
Hi Maarten, Hi Andrius,
I've been in the vicinity for a couple of years now, and yet
neither biology nor chemistry are my field, far from it. Thank
you for helping me connecting the dots with this issue! :)
Maarten L. Hekkelman, on 2024-10-30:
> Of course, it would be easiest to include the com
Hi,
On 10/29/24 23:29, Étienne Mollier wrote:
I was wondering whether the 422M dataset components.cif
wouldn't be worth injecting into the libcifpp-data package, to
facilitate the handling of data by end users?
Maarten and I have discussed the prospect of packaging components.cif
before [1],
Hi Étienne,
Of course, it would be easiest to include the components.cif file in
libcifpp. However, this file changes weekly and it is huge. Two good
reasons not to do it.
What I did for density-fitness e.g. is include a subset of
components.cif large enough for testing. That way, you can av
Hi Maarten,
I'm dealing with python-biopython release critical bug #1086156,
and I was wondering whether the 422M dataset components.cif
wouldn't be worth injecting into the libcifpp-data package, to
facilitate the handling of data by end users? I guess that sure
would make the package rather lar
6 matches
Mail list logo
