On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:14:11AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> What I am asking in option 3 is to ship EMBOSS 6.3.1 in Squeeze. Would it be
> disruptive for your work with BioLib? I am a bit shocked to read that you
> consider that option 3 (distributing EMBOSS 6.3.1 in Squeeze) is
> ???heroic?
Le Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:17:40PM +0200, Pjotr Prins a écrit :
> I have an interest here, as I am mapping EMBOSS with BioLib - and
> versioning plays a role.
>
> Appears to me that supporting Embassy has less of an interest with the
> core EMBOSS team. EMBOSS is changing - that is what counts. If
I have an interest here, as I am mapping EMBOSS with BioLib - and
versioning plays a role.
Appears to me that supporting Embassy has less of an interest with the
core EMBOSS team. EMBOSS is changing - that is what counts. If anyone
cares to keep Embassy it would make sense to package it with an
ea
I am going to ask on the EMBOSS mailing list.
Pj.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100812212121.ga3...@thebird.nl
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:16:31PM -0400, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 08:55:32 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > To put the emboss and embassy packages in consistency in Squeeze, here are
> > possible solutions:
> >
> > - Remove the embassy-* packages from testing.
> > - Up
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 08:55:32 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> To put the emboss and embassy packages in consistency in Squeeze, here are
> possible solutions:
>
> - Remove the embassy-* packages from testing.
> - Upload emboss 6.2 to testing-proposed-updates.
> - Upgrade embassy-* packages w
6 matches
Mail list logo