On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:14:11AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > What I am asking in option 3 is to ship EMBOSS 6.3.1 in Squeeze. Would it be > disruptive for your work with BioLib? I am a bit shocked to read that you > consider that option 3 (distributing EMBOSS 6.3.1 in Squeeze) is > ???heroic???. I > use it and follow the upstream mailing list; there is no indication that it > introduces regressions. The bugs I have reported as a user and as a packager > in > earlier versions are fixed in 6.3.1.
No, no! There is a misunderstanding. Please ship EMBOSS-latest. BioLib uses the actual checkout of the CVS tree of EMBOSS, so I am even further ahead. As I understood the problem is that Embassy does not properly work against 6.3.1 - and should therefore either be dropped, or shipped with a working 6.2. Right? I meant to say that supporting Embassy, if that is not coming from the EMBOSS team itself, would be heroic. That is what I am asking on the EMBOSS-list - whether they intend to keep Embassy up to date, or not. BioLib does not use Embassy tools. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Pj. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100813055513.ga4...@thebird.nl
