Re: RFS: argh

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Shayan, On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:37:01PM +0100, Shayan Doust wrote: > ... > But no worries, I really don't mind quickly changing the name to include > "lib", > it's just that from the implications of seeing different packages, I had a > different idea of appending "lib". I did some further

Re: RFS: argh

2020-09-21 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:43:05PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > Hello Shayan, > > On 21.09.20 14:33, Shayan Doust wrote: > > Hello Steffen, > > > >> looks good to me, but the binary name should be libargh-dev, right? > > It's just a singular header file, so I am following the same naming >

Re: RFS: argh

2020-09-21 Thread Steffen Möller
Hello Shayan, On 21.09.20 14:33, Shayan Doust wrote: > Hello Steffen, > >> looks good to me, but the binary name should be libargh-dev, right? > It's just a singular header file, so I am following the same naming convention > as some of the other header-only library packages[1]. > > Kind regards,

Re: RFS: argh

2020-09-21 Thread Shayan Doust
Hello Steffen, > looks good to me, but the binary name should be libargh-dev, right? It's just a singular header file, so I am following the same naming convention as some of the other header-only library packages[1]. Kind regards, Shayan Doust [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/tao-json/-/

Re: RFS: argh

2020-09-21 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Shayan, On 21.09.20 14:09, Shayan Doust wrote: > Hello, > > I believe argh[1] is ready for a sponsored upload. Do let me know if anything > needs altering. > > Kind regards, > Shayan Doust > > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/argh/ looks good to me, but the binary name should be libarg