Re: [RFS] seq-gen

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 02:33:52AM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Well the data and docs look non-free - will ask upstream. We might get rid of the docs - but if we need the data these should be published with a free license. > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 02:17 Nilesh Patra, wrote: > > > While we will

Re: [RFS] seq-gen

Well the data and docs look non-free - will ask upstream. On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 02:17 Nilesh Patra, wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 01:48 Andreas Tille, wrote: > >> Hi Nilesh, >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:38:58PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I've added autopkgtests for seq-g

Re: [RFS] seq-gen

Hi On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 01:48 Andreas Tille, wrote: > Hi Nilesh, > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:38:58PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > Hi, > > I've added autopkgtests for seq-gen and this builds in a clean chroot > with > > passing tests. > > Thanks for your work on this. Unfortunately I doubt

Re: [RFS] seq-gen

Hi Nilesh, On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:38:58PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi, > I've added autopkgtests for seq-gen and this builds in a clean chroot with > passing tests. Thanks for your work on this. Unfortunately I doubt that the effort to add tests to packages in non-free is a waste of time

[RFS] seq-gen

Hi, I've added autopkgtests for seq-gen and this builds in a clean chroot with passing tests. The changes have been pushed here[1]. Needs review and sponsorship. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/seq-gen Thanks and regards Nilesh