Well the data and docs look non-free - will ask upstream. On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 02:17 Nilesh Patra, <npatra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, 01:48 Andreas Tille, <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > >> Hi Nilesh, >> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 08:38:58PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I've added autopkgtests for seq-gen and this builds in a clean chroot >> with >> > passing tests. >> >> Thanks for your work on this. Unfortunately I doubt that the effort >> to add tests to packages in non-free is a waste of time since CI >> is only run on packages in main. In this case it would be better to >> discuss a free license with upstream. PAML is meanwhile free - so >> chances to review seq-gen should be promising. >> > > While we will sure ask for a license file here, but this comment: > > https://github.com/rambaut/Seq-Gen/issues/12#issuecomment-397349452 > > Seems to convey that this is free? > I did checkout a few files and they seem to have the BSD license at the > top of them. > > Would you have ideas as to what component here would be non-free? > > Or is it just the absence of LICENSE file that makes it so? > > Kind regards > Nilesh > >>
