I'm not sure my previous mail has been correctly sent. Maybe it was too
big...
The cmake log is available there : http://pastebin.com/1pmrgv90
Thank you for your help,
Best regards,
Corentin
2016-01-18 10:31 GMT+01:00 Gert Wollny :
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 09:45 +
Hi everybody
I'm still working on the packaging of the new upstream release of FW4SPL.
Today, I get this errror :
> [ 55%] Building CXX object
> fwItkIO/CMakeFiles/fwItkIO.dir/src/inr2itk/itkInrImageIOFactory.cpp.o
> cd /build/fw4spl-0.10.2.2/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwItkIO && /usr/bin/c++
> -DBOO
Hi Andreas
2016-01-12 14:37 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Correntin,
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:25:54PM +0100, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > Can you have a look on my last changes on the camp package ?
> > I integrated the new upstream release of camp this morning.
>
Hi Andreas,
Can you have a look on my last changes on the camp package ?
I integrated the new upstream release of camp this morning.
These changes are needed for fw4spl 0.10.2.
Best regards,
Corentin
MT+01:00 Gert Wollny :
> On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 10:27 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 10:04:58AM +0100, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > > Ok I just saw (and remembered) that insighttoolkit3 has been
> > > requested to
> > > be removed.
&g
Ok I just saw (and remembered) that insighttoolkit3 has been requested to
be removed.
Does this mean we have to make FW4SPL compatible with the last ITK version
? Is it the only way ?
Thank you,
Corentin
2015-12-23 9:36 GMT+01:00 Corentin Desfarges <
corentin.desfarges@gmail.com>:
Hi Andreas
Yesterday I fixed my vtk issue by replacing libvtk5.8-qt4 with
libvtk5.10-qt4.
But now, I'm face to an itk problem during linking :
[100%] Linking CXX executable bin/fwItkIOTest
> cd /home/corentin/dev/fw4spl/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/fwItkIOTest &&
> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMa
Hi Andreas,
Currently, it's very complicated to me to work on the fw4spl package. I
apologize for that. I've read the other mails, and I don't have time to
package the new version of fw4spl.
So I'm trying to fix the current issues. I've started with the fix of the
camp package. I've pushed some c
+02:00 Corentin Desfarges <
corentin.desfarges@gmail.com>:
> 2015-09-01 12:25 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
>
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
>> > I want to rebuild fw4spl, but I can't install libboost-all-dev on my
>> s
2015-09-01 12:25 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > I want to rebuild fw4spl, but I can't install libboost-all-dev on my
> system
> > (Debian Stretch, up-to-date).
> >
> > *$ sudo apt-get inst
ource changed by Corentin Desfarges <
corentin.desfarges@gmail.com>
dpkg-source --before-build fw4spl
dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libboost-all-dev
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied;
aborting
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use
Indeed, you're right, I will do it this afternoon.
Corentin
2015-07-16 14:50 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Corentin,
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:38:56AM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > fw4spl is now ready for a new upload. I have chosen to restrict the
> packag
Hi,
fw4spl is now ready for a new upload. I have chosen to restrict the package
to amd64, because the fw4spl's team doesn't have time to work on ARM
support at the moment.
it's possible that the package support arm in some time.
Best regards,
Corentin
2015-07-15 16:03 GMT+02:00 Steve Robbins :
> You are right. Either gccxml needs to be updated or replaced. I don't know
> if the latter is possible for activiz but gccxml is dead upstream. ITK is
> moving to castxml next release. Incidentally I uploaded the castxml package
> last night. Right now
2015-07-15 15:58 GMT+02:00 Steve Robbins :
> Just to ask the obvious : in your pbuilder environment is the gcc v5 from
> experimental?
>
Yes it is. But now I get the error, by adding CC=gcc-5 CXX=g++-5 before
debuild.
re is nothing I can do except wait for it, right ?
Corentin
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746846
[2] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/castxml_0.1+git20150630-1.html
2015-07-15 14:42 GMT+02:00 Corentin Desfarges <
corentin.desfarges@gmail.com>:
> Hi Andreas
>
&
2015 at 12:17:39PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with :
> >
> > pbuilder create
> > pdebuild
>
> As in the bug report you need to
>
> apt-get -t
Hi,
I'm trying to fix the bug #65, but I can't reproduce it with :
pbuilder create
pdebuild
The build finish with success (excepted some lintian errors and warnings).
But nothing about gcc...
And I wish have a small explanation, I'm not sure to understand :
Fix blocked by 79150
Hi everybody
I'm reflecting about the upload of a new version of fw4spl, which uses qt5
and vtk6, but I encounter some problems:
- fw4spl needs QVTK to build, and the only version of the corresponding
package is libvtk5.8-qt4. However, this package is not compatible with
libvtk6
- fw4spl needs li
Hi Steve,
It doesn't work on Debian. I'm just trying to make it work.
But activiz.net seems to have been updated to work with vtk6.1 :
http://public.kitware.com/gitweb?p=activizdotnet.git
2015-07-09 17:40 GMT+02:00 Steve M. Robbins :
> On July 9, 2015 03:50:58 PM Corentin De
g/fw4spl
2015-07-09 16:18 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Corentin,
>
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:50:58PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > I'm faced a new problem : activiz is now working with libvtk6 [1], and
> > fw4spl with libvtk5. But, these packages are NOT comp
08 18:54 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Corentin,
>
> please be so kind and do not CC me (as per lists.debian.org policy). :-)
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 06:25:33PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > > Feel free to discuss everything that might be unclear on the usual
>
2015-07-08 16:11 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Corentin,
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 03:51:58PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > > So its in Debian Med SVN and may be this is the reason why you did not
> > > found it since you are checking only SVN, right? I thin
2015-07-08 15:25 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Corentin,
>
Hi Andreas
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:36:11PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > According the fw4spl tracker [1], it sounds to me that the main problem
> of
> > fw4spl (excepting the ARM support) is t
Hi,
According the fw4spl tracker [1], it sounds to me that the main problem of
fw4spl (excepting the ARM support) is the fail of the build of its
dependences, especially avifile and activiz.net (gdcm and ITK depend on
activiz.net and vxl depends on avifile).
So, I suppose that if avifile and acti
Ok fine ! Thank you very much.
Corentin
2015-03-30 15:32 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Corentin,
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:44:54PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote:
> > I've just tried to build the fw4spl with the latest changes, and it
> > works very well.
>
Hi Andreas,
I've just tried to build the fw4spl with the latest changes, and it
works very well.
I've no answer from the bug reporters, but my changes seem in line with
the policy and their comments.
Thank you for your help,
Best regards,
Corentin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-r
Hi everybody
I have just been notified of two "Release Critical Bug" concerning fw4spl.
As it is the first time that one of my packages is concerned by a report, I
would like some clarifications before to do something wrong,
About the first bug [1], I presume that it comes from this line of my
Fi
Hi Andreas,
I pushed the last version of pristine-tar.
By the way, I fixed the CMake issue (I was forced to launch CMake twice).
I'm still working on the shared libraries.
Best regards,
Corentin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi Andreas,
About the excluded files, I've finally decided to remove them. I pushed
the last changes this afternoon.
Hmmm, pristine-tar has not changed and the lintian error
E: fw4spl source: source-is-missing Apps/VRRender/doc/source/_static/jquery.js
remains on my side. Don't you get this er
Hi Andreas,
About the excluded files, I've finally decided to remove them. I pushed
the last changes this afternoon. They fix too the change of the binary's
name ( launcher => fwLauncher, to respect the spirit of fw4spl ).
I've tried to post (twice) a question about my ldconfig issue on the
debi
onf"
fi
#DEBHELPER#
exit 0
(I had this warning : maintainer-script-lacks-debhelper-token)
And it's " #DEBHELPER# " which add the call to ldconfig...
Since I'm a bit in a hurry I'd recommend to ask on
debian-ment...@lists.debian.org where this kind
Hi,
To finish my work on fw4spl, I have to fix the 3 last lintian's issues.
W: fw4spl: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
W: fw4spl: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
W: fw4spl: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig
I don't understand why I get these errors. ldconfig is used to register the
shared
li
Hi,
To finish my work on fw4spl, I have to fix the 3 last lintian's issues.
W: fw4spl: postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
W: fw4spl: postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig
W: fw4spl: postrm-unsafe-ldconfig
I don't understand why I get these errors. ldconfig is used to register the
shared
li
Hi everybody,
In my d/copyright, I added this line to exclude some files :
Files-Excluded: Apps/VRRender/doc
It works when I get the debian/* directory and that I get the sources with :
uscan --force-download
But the files under "Apps/VRRender/doc" aren't removed if I try to get the
source
Hi Andreas,
In my opinion fw4spl is almost ready for uploading.
There is still some lintian warnings, and I haven't time to fix them
this week.
I ping you as soon as the package is ready;
Best regards,
Corentin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
I come back because I've finally found a solution to my problem :
I added this line to my postinst script :
/usr/lib/fw4spl > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/fw4spl.conf && ldconfig
and this line to my postrm script :
rm /etc/ld.so.conf.d/fw4spl.conf && ldconfig
Hoping it will help someone some
se.
I was speaking with a Debian Mentor about this situation, and he tells me that
I could use the multi-orig.tar.gz, to don't add the test data for every new
upstream release.
Hoping it will help someone one day...
Thank you for your time !
Best regards,
Corentin Desfarges
--
To UNSUBS
u for your help,
Best regards,
Corentin Desfarges
Hi Andreas !
0 packages upgraded, 397 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 81.1 MB/196 MB of archives. After unpacking 836 MB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libjpeg8-dev : Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev but 1:1.3.1-6 is to be installed.
libjpeg6
Since libcamp is available from Debian mirror (as any other package)
there is nothing specifically needed. So I tried to build the package
but somehow the Build-Depends seems to contain conflicting packages:
...
0 packages upgraded, 397 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to ge
I've one more question. Since that libcamp has been uploaded in
unstable, how can I configure pbuilder to force it to use sid's packages ?
I have seen a documentation about it one month ago, but I'm not able to
find it today...
Thank you !
Corentin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-
Hi Andreas,
>> >1557 CMake Error: Could not open file for write in copy operation
/qt.conf.tmp
>> >1558 CMake Error: : System Error: Permission denied
>> >1559 CMake Error at SrcLib/core/fwGuiQt/
> CMakeLists.txt:12 (configure_file):
>> >1560 configure_file Problem configuring file
>> Looks l
Hi Andras,
Besides these formal things I stumbled upon the
Build-Depends: libcamp0.7
We always need to Build-Depend from *-dev packages. Without having
tested the build myself I'd bet it would fail in a pbuilder environment
(OK, libcamp0.7-dev is not available from Debian mirrors - so we can
Hi Andreas
Well, as Debian Policy suggest you should update upstream and
pristine-tar
git import-orig --pristine-tar
As far as I can see you rather updated the single files in master. The
usual way to do the *Debian packaging* is that master contains upstream
(as imported from the tar
Hi,
I suppose that I've made something wrong. After have seen that the
source on my Alioth repository [1] was wrong (different of those on my
Github repository), I've pushed on the master branch a new version of
these files. But I don't know how to update the two other branches
(upstream and
Hi Andreas
it might be sensible if you commit your work to a repository to let
others have a look. Otherwise its hard to do some speculation.
You're right. I didn't committed my work before because the Git repository
of fw4spl wasn't ready. But now it is, and I've just pushed my package
on Al
to add this line in
d/rules too :
export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--no-as-needed
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/lib/fw4spl -ldl
But it doesn't work.
Does anyone have an idea?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Corentin Desfarges
Hi Andreas
That permits to launch the unit tests build, but they are not executed...
Have you any idea ?
May be you need to find out what command might trigger the test suite and
force this via
override_dh_auto_test
Finally I found a solution. I pushed a patch to fix the unit tests executi
Hi Andreas,
About the unit tests for Camp, can you tell me what do you think about this
patch (to add at d/patches)
--- a/cmake/Config.cmake
+++ b/cmake/Config.cmake
@@ -20,16 +20,16 @@
)
endif()
-# Set the default test build option to false
+# Set the default test build option to tru
Hi!
since currently the new processing
What do you mean by "new processing" ?
"processing of NEW"
https://wiki.debian.org/NewQueue
Thank you !
Since I noticed your latest commits I was trying to build again. I
noticed that you have added libboost-all-dev which is a bit lazy since
Hi Andreas
I pushed my changes for Camp this morning.
I'd recommend to work with a local build
I don't understand. Wasn't it what I did for Camp ?
since currently the new processing
What do you mean by "new processing" ? The packaging of fw4spl, or the steps
that I followed to package C
Hi Andreas,
I confirm that it looks good and besides the following nitpicking it is
ready for upload:
1. d/README.source: I have no idea what you want to tell the reader here
Since d/watch shows where the source is originated from I do not see
what the additional info from where it was
Hi Andreas!
$ lintian -i -I *.changes
warning: the authors of lintian do not recommend running it with root
privileges!
I'd agree with lintian that you should not run this as root. Your
prompt does not give any hint that you are root, however.
I'm using the root account, but the problem d
Hi Andreas,
>Hmmm, I'm not sure what you really mean. Is there any problem with
>the code you can download from
>https://github.com/greenjava/camp/releases
>If no, just use it. If yes, what exactly is the problem and what do
>you mean be 'fork'?
No there is no problem. If a problem happened
if you wonder why your commit does not work with git-buildpackage just try
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 805b3fc..5fd65fa 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-camp (0.7.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+camp (0.7.1.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
Hi Andreas,
This answers the question "from where" but not "how". In "To create a
new local git repository" in our policy[1] it is recommended to do
svn export svn://anonscm.debian.org/svn/debian-med/trunk/package_template debian
I always start with editing the debian/watch file from there and
Hi Andreas
- I've compressed the sources of Camp in camp-0.7.1.tar.gz,
Question: How did you obtained these sources before compressing them.
I downloaded these source here : https://github.com/greenjava/camp
- Then on the wiki page of MoM, there is a link to a git repository
for my project
Hi Andreas !
I began to try to package Camp, and I've some questions :
- I've compressed the sources of Camp in camp-0.7.1.tar.gz, and next
I've copied it under the name of camp_0.7.1.orig.tar.gz.
Then I've put the directory debian/* into camp-0.7.1 and run pdebuild.
Is it the right process ?
Hi Andreas
I've succeed to get the same CMake issue as you and I think that I know
where she comes from.
In the last lines of the main CMakeLists.txt, you can found something like :
IF( ${vxl_BINARY_DIR} MATCHES \\+ )
MESSAGE(SEND_ERROR "You cannot have a + in your binary path")
ENDIF( ${vx
Thank you for all these informations. Hm, I just spoke with a fw4spl
responsible, and he told me to concentrated me on the packing of Camp,
because the dependencies with VXL could be remove from fw4spl...
But to train me, I would like succeed to apply what you've just
explained to me.
>I thi
hout modify the package :
On a Debian system (Jessie), I my work directory, I have these files
(found on https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libvxl1-dev) :
vxl_1.17.0-8.1.dsc
vxl_1.17.0.orig.tar.gz
vxl_1.17.0-8.1.debian.tar.xz
I run these commands :
pbuilder --create
pbuilder --build vx
> After doing so I was running into a cmake issue:
>
> dh_auto_configure # See bug: 708131
> -- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.9.1
> -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.9.1
> -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
> -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works
> -- D
and once built, these bundles contain libraries, icons, pictures... I
suppose that I know the answer, but, is it possible, on a Debian system,
to install a package who deploy these bundles into /usr/lib/my_pckg ?
Else it means that fw4spl need a very big revision to be adapted for
Debian
uld cause more problems than it solves... It
seems me that is the simplest solution.
I don't know if anyone else uses Camp today, but maybe that I can ask it
to the person in charge of Camp.
Best regards,
Corentin Desfarges, IRCAD France
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lis
s VGL, V3P, VLC...) and Camp (https://github.com/greenjava/camp/).
Do you have any suggestions to help us solve these issues?
About Camp, we thought about integrating it into the framework, because it
isn't maintained for one year now...
Thanks for your help!
Best regards,
Corentin Desfarges, IRCAD France
66 matches
Mail list logo
