It is complicated to give you a precise estimation, because I'm currently starting an other project, and I don't have all the arguments needed for taking decisions about who works on fw4spl for Debian-Med, nor when. But Debian-Med is always an important project for the IRCAD, and I suppose that one or more people will work on fw4spl "for Debian". And personnaly, I DON'T leave out the project.
By the way, you have to know that fw4spl has several branches [1] (==versions) - 0.9.2 - 0.10.0 - 0.10.1 - 0.10.2 ... And some of them use vtk6. But the packaging of a different version sounds to me be a big work. I'm discussing of the VTK problem with my colleagues, and I tell you as soon as I get more information about the packaging of the new version of fw4spl. Thank you for your very helpful support Best regards, Corentin [1] https://github.com/fw4spl-org/fw4spl 2015-07-09 16:18 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tille <[email protected]>: > Hi Corentin, > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:50:58PM +0200, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > > I'm faced a new problem : activiz is now working with libvtk6 [1], and > > fw4spl with libvtk5. But, these packages are NOT compatible. > > So in the case where I fix activiz (by using libvtk6), fw4spl will not > > build with libvtk5 anymore, and this is currently not possible... > > Hmmm, that's a schame. Could you find any estimation when fw4spl might > be compatible with vtk6. I have heard rumors that vtk maintainers feel > overworked with maintaining two versions and it would be a good idea to > work straight to vtk6 compatibility. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [email protected] > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > >
