DLA needed for NBD 1:3.15.2-3

2022-03-09 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi, There are two CVEs in NBD currently. One of them does not apply to stretch (it is in functionality introduced in NBD 3.16), but part of the other does. I've prepared an update and pushed it to my repository at https://salsa.debian.org/wouter/nbd/-/tree/debian-stretch I've not yet tested this

Re: DLA needed for NBD 1:3.15.2-3

2022-03-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi Chris, On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:11:41AM +, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Wouter, > > > I've prepared an update and pushed it to my repository at > > https://salsa.debian.org/wouter/nbd/-/tree/debian-stretch > > Thanks for preparing this. I'm very happy to handle the DLA side of > this for you.

Re: Confusing our users - who is supporting LTS?

2018-10-27 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 01:02:57PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > I meant that we would say that stable is supported by the security team. > And instead of saying that Jessie was supported by the LTS team, we > would say supported by Freexian. I would object to that, on the grounds

Re: Confusing our users - who is supporting LTS?

2018-10-28 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 01:14:13AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Debian can't afford to pay developers in general, and previous > proposals to pay specific developers were not well received. That was over a decade ago. The circumstances at the time were also different. -- To the thief who stole

Re: squeeze update of nbd?

2015-05-13 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 02:50:49PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello Wouter, > > the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are > currently open in the Squeeze version of nbd: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-0847 > > Would you like to take care of t