Am 28.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:02:47PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> In my opinion OpenJDK 7 should be an adequate replacement for OpenJDK 6
>> and I can't think of any serious regressions since all Java packages
>> have proven to work with both JD
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:02:47PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> In my opinion OpenJDK 7 should be an adequate replacement for OpenJDK 6
> and I can't think of any serious regressions since all Java packages
> have proven to work with both JDKs. Why not strongly recommend to LTS
> users to switch
Am 28.01.2016 um 17:22 schrieb Moritz Muehlenhoff:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:24:13AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> On Tue, January 19, 2016 17:56, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
>>> Moreover, squeeze lts has been advertised to end next February, the 6th
>>> to be precise. At the same time, the
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:24:13AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, January 19, 2016 17:56, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > Moreover, squeeze lts has been advertised to end next February, the 6th
> > to be precise. At the same time, the security team would support wheezy
> > until April 26t
On Tue, January 19, 2016 17:56, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Moreover, squeeze lts has been advertised to end next February, the 6th
> to be precise. At the same time, the security team would support wheezy
> until April 26th 2016, which is the Jessie release date + 1 year. What
> do you think if
Hi,
El 16/09/15 a las 17:40, Raphael Hertzog escribió:
> Hello,
>
> here's a small summary of what has been discussed during the LTS BoF
> at DebConf 15 in Heidelberg.
>
> Usage of security.debian.org for Wheezy's lts period
>
>
> We want to
Hello,
here's a small summary of what has been discussed during the LTS BoF
at DebConf 15 in Heidelberg.
Usage of security.debian.org for Wheezy's lts period
We want to the usual security repository on security.debian.org
for Wheezy LTS:
- use
