On 2016-05-17 12:31:27, Markus Koschany wrote:
> [dropping Rene from CC because he is subscribed to debian-java]
>
> Am 17.05.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
>> On 2016-04-25 06:34:53, Markus Koschany wrote:
> [...]
>>> We don't intend to remove OpenJDK 6 but it will receive no further
>>> s
[dropping Rene from CC because he is subscribed to debian-java]
Am 17.05.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
> On 2016-04-25 06:34:53, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
>> We don't intend to remove OpenJDK 6 but it will receive no further
>> security updates.
>
> .. starting from june?
Starting fr
On 2016-04-25 06:34:53, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 25.04.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>> we are mainly concerned about runtime issues with OpenJDK 7. Libreoffice
>>> declares dependencies on default-jre | open
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 01:07:54PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I have discussed this on debian-java already but in short I had to
> ponder about several things and one thing was how to spend our resources
> responsibly. Of course I can fix all build failures in Wheezy LTS but
> fixing 140 bugs
Am 25.04.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Holger Levsen:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I think in those cases it is reasonable to recommend to manually change
>> build dependencies back to OpenJDK 6 because rebuilding a package does
>> not pose a security risk and shoul
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:34:53PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 25.04.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> we are mainly concerned about runtime issues with OpenJDK 7. Libreoffice
> >> declares dependencies on def
Am 25.04.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> we are mainly concerned about runtime issues with OpenJDK 7. Libreoffice
>> declares dependencies on default-jre | openjdk-7-jre, so I believe it
>> should be fine. I am awa
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I think in those cases it is reasonable to recommend to manually change
> build dependencies back to OpenJDK 6 because rebuilding a package does
> not pose a security risk and should never happen on production systems
> anyway.
I d
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> we are mainly concerned about runtime issues with OpenJDK 7. Libreoffice
> declares dependencies on default-jre | openjdk-7-jre, so I believe it
> should be fine. I am aware of build failures with OpenJDK 7 and I think
> that c
Am 25.04.2016 um 11:41 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:22:51PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I would like to ask everyone who uses Java in server or desktop
>> environments to test their applications with OpenJDK 7 and to prepare
>> for the switch. This can be achie
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:22:51PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I would like to ask everyone who uses Java in server or desktop
> environments to test their applications with OpenJDK 7 and to prepare
> for the switch. This can be achieved by installing either openjdk-7-jre
> or openjdk-7-jr
Hi all,
as you may already be aware, the intention is to make OpenJDK 7 the
default Java implementation in Wheezy LTS to ensure full security
support until 31 May 2018. The switch will happen on 26 June 2016.
I would like to ask everyone who uses Java in server or desktop
environments to test the
12 matches
Mail list logo
