On 2016-04-25 06:34:53, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 25.04.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:17:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >>> we are mainly concerned about runtime issues with OpenJDK 7. Libreoffice >>> declares dependencies on default-jre | openjdk-7-jre, so I believe it >>> should be fine. I am aware of build failures with OpenJDK 7 and I think >>> that can't be avoided unless we want to redo the whole OpenJDK 7 >>> transition. [1] >>> >>> I think in those cases it is reasonable to recommend to manually change >>> build dependencies back to OpenJDK 6 because rebuilding a package does >> >> Only if it stays (unsupported) and it's not actually removed from the >> archive.. > > We don't intend to remove OpenJDK 6 but it will receive no further > security updates.
.. starting from june? Because there *are* issues on OpenJDK-6 *now*: should they be triaged out of there, or will they actually be fixed in an gigantic upload at the end of the day? https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/openjdk-6 a, which his frontdesk hat. -- We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be more humane and fair than the world your governments have made before. - John Perry Barlow, 1996 A Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace
