Hi Mike,
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 14:21, Hugh McMaster wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 00:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>
>> Personally, it probably makes more sense for the new stretch version to
>> be +deb9u3, built on top of the already uploaded package (and similar
>
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 00:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Personally, it probably makes more sense for the new stretch version to
> be +deb9u3, built on top of the already uploaded package (and similar
> for buster) with a second release.d.o bug describing the new fixes.
>
> You /can/ re-use the vers
Hi Adam,
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 19:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 09:30 +, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay. I have uploaded +deb9u2 and +deb10u2 of
> > libexif
> > now. I will write the SRU acceptance request bugs this afternoon.
> >
>
> There's already #961019
Hi Mike,
On Tue, 19 May 2020 at 00:37, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Mo 18 Mai 2020 16:14:39 CEST, Hugh McMaster wrote:
>
> > [...]
>
> > In many ways, the debdiff for Jessie is the same for Stretch. The
> > Developers Reference says SRUs need bug numbers and more detail in
On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 15:19, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> libexif 0.6.21-2+deb8u2 has arrived in jessie-security.
>
> Paperwork for jessie LTS (DLA announcement mail, Debian website
> update, security-tracker update) has been done.
Thank you for your help with this.
Hugh
Hi Mike and LTS team,
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 15:42, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Jessie version of libexif:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-12767
>
> Would you like to take care of this your
Hallo Mike,
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 15:42, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> The Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
> currently open in the Jessie version of libexif:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-12767
>
> Would you like to take care of this yourself?
>
>
