On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 00:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Personally, it probably makes more sense for the new stretch version to > be +deb9u3, built on top of the already uploaded package (and similar > for buster) with a second release.d.o bug describing the new fixes. > > You /can/ re-use the version if that would be preferable, as the > package is still in (old)stable-new right now, but that will require a > reject+reupload cycle, and presumably corresponding re-tag on the git > side.
Good to know, but by the sound of things, incrementing is going to cleaner and quicker. I'm assuming that all of the fixes are either already present in > unstable, or aren't relevant there. I was planning on releasing the new upstream release to fix the three outstanding CVEs. Would you prefer a final release of the old version instead? Thanks, Hugh >
