Hello,
you're maintaining a Debian package which provides a trigger file.
Currently a package that "activates" a trigger is put in the
"triggers-awaited" status where it doesn't fulfill dependencies.
The trigger must first be processed and only then is the package
considered as "installed".
I bel
Another way to deal with this issue would be to extract the relevant
information from /etc/os-release in the chroot. It exports $NAME
and $PRETTY_NAME (and $VERSION for released versions of products).
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http:/
Hello,
please have a look at the attached patch and consider merging it. It's
required to get live-installer to work.
There's also another patch for live-build that adds the missing bootloader
menu entries to start debian-installer from the live image. Please
consider including it as well.
Thank
Hello Daniel,
On Sat, 03 Jun 2017, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
> Since live.debian.net went down, the contributing section of live-manual
> didn't get any updates and there are no debian-next branches at
> anonscm.d.o/.../live-* as mentioned therein...
>
> So what's currently the live-team's preferred
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
> the attached patch streamlines the missing keyboard shortcut "A" for the
> "Advanced options" entry in the syslinux-based boot menu configs.
Thanks, committed to git.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support D
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, 07 Jun 2017, Daniel Reichelt wrote:
> The duplication was introduced by [3] and is fixed by this patch to read
>
> 8<-
> cp -a /bin/live-boot "${DESTDIR}/bin"
> >8-
Ap
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Grégory DAVID wrote:
>With a simple live-build config,
What is your simple live-build config? Please share your config directory
and/or the command line options that you are using.
Thank you!
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
> You might also consider not hard-coding the path at all, and simply rely
> on PATH being set properly. This should be a safe assumption, especially
> since the binary is now in /bin
The path is not hardcoded anywhere, except in the place where we wa
Hi,
On Fri, 04 Aug 2017, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I've just added support for this in live-wrapper. I'll let Raphaël do
> the changes in live-build.
Done in git as well.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to
Hello,
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> No keyboard localisation when choosing "Debian Live with Localisation
> Support". For example, choosing "Spanish" at this boot submenu, keyboard
> is set to an USA layout (in any X, TTY and pty).
>
> Keyboard layout should do same associations as
Hello,
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> I also ran into this same error a while ago. It is caused by partition
> devices being created when parted creates partitions, which are not
> cleaned up when the loop devices are cleaned up. I'm attaching a patch
> that fixes this, by passing
Hi Matthijs,
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> To fix this I've attached a patch that, passes --count-links to du when
> the target is FAT, to make the space estimation correct.
Thanks for your multiple patches, I applied them all in git.
Would you like to become co-maintainer of l
On Sat, 09 Sep 2017, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> your package appears to be relying on the internal layout of
> /var/lib/apt/lists
> and the location of that directory (which is configurable), as it matches the
> following regular expression (and a quick check did not rule out a false
> positive
Hello Andreas,
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Andreas Heinlein wrote:
> Related to but not identical to #854004. Keyboard configuration is still
> not working in gnome shell 3.22 as expected. The fix for #854004 works
> on the console and has the effect that we now have two keyboard layouts
> in gnome shell
Hello Ronny,
On Thu, 05 Oct 2017, Ronny Standtke wrote:
> Read-only persistence mode doesn't currently work with overlayfs. The
> attached patch fixes this issue.
Can you be a bit more verbose in your explanation?
How can we reproduce the problem?
Why is your patch fixing the issue?
I will gla
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017, Ronny Standtke wrote:
> > Why is your patch fixing the issue?
>
> Because it correctly mounts the persistence partition in the overlayfs
> case including the necessary "/rw" postfix.
Ok, shouldn't the same fix be done here too then (for the opt_link case)?
https://anonscm.deb
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> After booting a Stretch live image, I tried to upgrade it to Sid, and
> it fails with this error:
>
> update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
> cp: target '/lib/live/mount/medium/live/vmlinuz.new' is not a directory
This is u
On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Goirand Thomas (aka zigo) wrote:
> I did try to purge and it didn't help. The issue is indeed about 2
> kernels installed, though as I wrote, upgrading linux-image-amd64 first
> works arround the problem. So I'm not sure what's going on, really. Any
> hint/clue ?
Run "update-i
Control: reassign -1 live-tools
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Building cpio /boot/initrd.img-4.9.0-4-amd64.new initramfs
> cp: target '/lib/live/mount/medium/live/vmlinuz.new' is not a directory
>
> I still don't see where to search... :/
I guess that you have live-tools installed
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Could you please review the patch and let me know if you think it's ok,
> apply to the git, and allow me to upload?
I think it's wrong because it handles vmlinuz/initrd separately. I pushed
what I think is a proper fix into git. Can you test the git ver
Hi,
On Thu, 07 Dec 2017, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > the generated
> > script initially was supposed to be a wrapper script around xorriso
>
> Out of curiosity: Inhowfar is xorriso in need of a wrapper for the
> debian-live use case ?
> (This is no criticism. I just want to learn about the motivati
Hi,
On Sat, 16 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
> Now using:
>
> --linux-flavours="amd64:amd64 686"
>
> in a i386 system does install amd64 kernel from amd64 architecture in a
> transparent manner.
>
> Please tell me if there's something to be polished so that it's accepted
> upstream.
Your patch doe
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
> I attach a patch that fixes this problem. Now failsafe entries are
> consistent in both autodetect entries and not autodetect entries.
Applied to git, had to update it due to the rename of variables that I
made earlier.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Deb
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
>* What led up to the situation?
The reportbug templates are not always very appropriate when you
just want to submit a patch... just go straight to the explanation
of the patch and why it should be merged.
> I attach a patch (that can be applied on curren
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017, Christian Knoke wrote:
> Installing live* packages into a normal Installation of Debian Stable
> can lead to boot problems on the host. Aptitude does not warn.
It's hardly a bug. But I improved the long description of the package
to make it clear that those packages must
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
> I attach a patch that fixes this problem. It seems it was just a typo.
Applied in git.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/
Hello,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> I can only find mke2fs mentioned in a comment:
> https://sources.debian.org/src/live-build/1:20171207/functions/losetup.sh/#L64
>
> My conclusion is thus that this is a false positive and the bug report
> should simply be closed.
>
> Would
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Fri, 26 Jan 2018, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> Much like we have --mirror-chroot and --mirror-binary, it would be nice to
> have --distribution-chroot and --distribution-binary so that we can build
> against a specific repository but have the final sources.list point to
> an
Hello,
I created a new team on salsa to migrate our git repositories:
https://salsa.debian.org/groups/live-team
I haven't migrated anything yet due to lack of time but I wonder
what repositories have to be migrated.
archive live-build.git live-manual.git live-tools.git
setup-rep
Hi,
On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Happy to do that for all the other debian-live --> live-team repos too
> if people would like me to - just say so. I've done a couple of other
Please go ahead!
Cheres,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexia
Hello,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The source of live-build might well need improvements to deal with
> what's inside the chroot it works with, but I don't think that's
> the main focus of this bug report. A package relationship of live-build,
> could not influence what's avai
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > /sbin/mkfs.ntfs is a path to an existing program
>
> Agreed, but that's not what the source code uses.
> Please read the source again. You'll spot it. ;)
Duh, indeed. Fixed in git. Thanks to Stefan who also showed me the typo.
Cheers,
--
Raphaë
Hi,
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >This seems to be an old copy of the live-build repo.
> >Do we need it?
>
> That was what I thought, too, hence I left it.
I think it can go. alioth always created a repository with the name of the
project and in many case, it was just not used. T
Hello,
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> The wget binary depends on many libraries. On Debian 9 (stretch) these
> are: libffi6, libgnutls30, libhogweed4, libidn11, libidn2-0, libnettle6,
> libp11-kit0, libpsl5, libtasn1-6, libunistring0. In total 8 megabytes.
> This increases the initra
Hi,
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, adrian15 wrote:
> 3) So I dropped that implementation of the patch and searched for
> something more elegant. A patch that modified the least possible lines
> of the live-build code and I finally found out how... with this new
> package based variable that would only have
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> initramfs-tools support hooks for top, premount, bottom when booting
> with boot=local or boot=nfs. Please add similar support to live-boot
> when booting with boot=live. A patch (for git) is attached.
I will gladly apply your patch but I think it'
Hello,
On Fri, 05 Jan 2018, intrigeri wrote:
> Benjamin Drung:
> > Therefore move /lib/live/mount to /run/live and skip the intermedia
> > /live mount points. This reduces code and complexity.
>
> As someone who had to repeatedly bang his head against exactly this
> part of the live-boot code (la
Control: tag -1 + pending
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Kristian Klausen wrote:
> Busybox version of wget does not check the certificate at all, which defeat
> the purpose of https.
> Tested with (on testing): busybox wget 'https://untrusted-root.badssl.com/'
> and busybox wget 'https://expired.badssl.co
On Fri, 09 Feb 2018, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> 10 repos moved now:
I just noticed that you did not setup the email integration with the
package tracker and the hook tagpending. I just did this for all the
repositories.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: https://www.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 08:28:55PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >On Fri, 09 Feb 2018, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> 10 repos moved now:
> >
> >I just noticed that you did not setup the email integration with the
&
Hello guys,
I tried to merged all pending patches recently and I just came on
this discussion and this bug submission.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017, William Prochazka wrote:
> I concede that I didn't realize the module file could include a raw
> directory since the man page refers to disk images.
Maybe y
Control: tag -1 - patch
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012, Lars Eric Scheidler wrote:
> Booting with fetch mechanism over tftp fails because of empty ${DEVICE}
> variable
> Attached is a patch to fix this issue.
Is this still a problem in today's live-boot? It looks like to me
that DEVICE should be set by Sel
Hello Steven,
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017, Steven Shiau wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Attached please find the patch for creating EFI boot mechanism for ARM64
> system. It would be great to have this for creating ARM64 Debian live. My 2
> cents.
How did you test the resulting image? On what kind of har
Control: reassign -1 live-boot
Control: tags -1 - patch
On Wed, 01 Mar 2017, Andreas Heinlein wrote:
> live-build generates a checksum file with seven lines of comments at the
> start, which explain what this file is for.
> While this works with "normal" shaXsum utilities, the script used to check
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, Steven Shiau wrote:
> > Please find below a few comments that I would like you to take into
> > account. Please submit an updated (and tested) patch via a merge request
> > on https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build
> Yes, I have sent the merge request:
> https://sal
Hi Thomas,
you forgot to cc the bug reporter, I'm not sure that he saw your email.
On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> i wonder why the built-in configuration of the EFI boot file does not work:
> # mount debian-live-9.3.0-amd64-xfce.iso /mnt/iso
I think you are not speaking of the sam
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> That is certainly the case for myself at $work - we have a lot of
> scripts to deal with installing&upgrading images, I've tested it, and
> they all break due to this change. In my case it's a derivative with
> proprietary bits, so I understand if th
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > Or maybe have a backward-compatible symlinks?
> >
> > This seems entirely reasonable. Can you work on this?
>
> Yes no problem, I'll give it a shot and send a PR for review before the
> end of the week.
Great.
> > BTW, given your vested inter
On Thu, 15 Mar 2018, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> I have finally tested git master and found one missing rename of
> /live/overlay (probably caused by applying my patches in a different
> order which causes merge conflicts). See
> https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-boot/merge_requests/6
> for a fix
Hi,
On Sun, 18 Nov 2018, adrian15 wrote:
> After testing this change the Grub menu which should have two kernel
> entries has only one. It might be other of my patches are pending of
> applying or somewhat I messed up with this patch.
It's up to you to figure this. I won't do it for you. And I wo
On Tue, 12 Mar 2019, adrian15 wrote:
> Is it ok for merging in Debian GIT or is there anything that I can improve?
I think it's OK if this was tested and if it doesn't break anything.
Do you have commit rights to apply it yourself?
If not, you might want to submit a merge request. You might want
Control: tag -1 pending
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12492
Hi,
On Sat, 11 May 2019, Steven Monai wrote:
> When the package 'libnss-systemd' is included in a debian-live image,
> all attempts to boot the image fail, hanging forever at a particular
> point in the
Control: tag -1 - patch
On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, Robert Munyer wrote:
> The cause is the command "rm -rf /var/cache/man/*" in
> "/usr/share/live/build/hooks/normal/0190-remove-temporary-files.hook.chroot".
>
> You can prevent the problem by doing the following before "lb config":
While this fixes th
Hello,
I'm sorry, you are probably well-meaning, but submitting so many bugs
and so many merge requests in a such a small timeframe is counter
productive.
I feel overwhelmed and instead of gradually building a trust relationship,
I'm putting the review work on the side because there's too much of
Hi Lyndon,
On Tue, 03 Mar 2020, jnq...@gmail.com wrote:
> I understand. Just to summarise before I expand on things, I
> contributed a lot of work on LB back around 2015 which never made it
> into master, and this is a resubmission (partial so far) of that work,
> because I'd like to see it merged
Hi,
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020, jnq...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Ok. Still, you should have discussed this beforehand and you should
> > have submitted stuff gradually as we merge your contributions.
>
> With all due respect, and no desire to fall out whatsoever, I feel a
> little defensive about being told
Hi,
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, jnq...@gmail.com wrote:
> since Daniel Baumann abandoned the live-build project a few years ago,
> should the copyright notices not now be updated to reflect this?, i.e.
Can you show precisely how you would like to reflect this?
I don't think that we want to add many ind
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020, jnq...@gmail.com wrote:
> I could not find an existing string "Copyright (C) 2016 The Debian Live
> team" in the codebase, so I'm not sure what you were referring to
> there.
Oh, I thought that you copied some sample copyright notice that you would
like to see updated... I did
Hi Roland,
thanks for your efforts! I would very much welcome if you could submit
gradually your live-build changes to the official repository so that you
don't have to keep a big fork.
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, Roland Clobus wrote:
> live-wrapper:
> * ISO volume ID contains '10.6.0'
> ** AP: live bui
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Roland Clobus wrote:
> If you want to use
> Bullseye, you'll need the daily installer
> (--parent-debian-installer-distribution daily), otherwise you'll get a
> warning that no kernel modules are found (because the installer is based
> on the current Debian Stable).
That state
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021, Michael . wrote:
> Now having said all that let me just ask you why would someone or
> "people" plural want to take on a task like this in Debian when Debian
> isn't fixing the problems it created. Maybe if Debian acknowledged
> the handling of the issue and made prov
Package: live-build
Version: 1:20220505
Severity: normal
User: de...@kali.org
Usertags: origin-kali
Looking closely at the issue that I reported in #1018873, I realize that
the Contents file have those entries:
lib/firmware/nvidia/470.141.03/gsp.bin
non-free/kernel/nvidia-kernel-support,non-
Hi,
Please keep the submitter in CC, I wasn't aware of your reply.
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> it needs finalized debianization of syslinux 6 first, which will have to
> go through NEW (again; after passing NEW for years it was now rejected
> because of its embedded gpxe that has
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> it needs finalized debianization of syslinux 6 first, which will have to
> go through NEW (again; after passing NEW for years it was now rejected
> because of its embedded gpxe that has not/never been in
> debian/copyright. as that is a major tas
Hello,
I worked on EFI boot support for Kali's live+installer image and
this resulted in the attached patch for live-build 3.0.5.
Some comments:
* The patch can't be used as-is because it assumes that syslinux 6
is packaged like syslinux 4 in wheezy (eg almost everything in
syslinux-common).
On Mon, 31 Mar 2014, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> It is rather intended to advertise a HFS+ image for booting Macs
> according to http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/11285.html .
>
> So my question here too:
> Is there any system known which would demand the EFI image to be
> presented in an Apple Partition M
Control: tag -1 patch
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 11:00 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I worked on EFI boot support for Kali's live+installer image and
> > this resulted in the attached patch for live-build 3.0.5.
>
> thanks. however, i&
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> How was the result from older xorriso better than from
> the newer one ?
>
> Which particular version produced better, which version
> produced the worse image ?
It's not about a particular version of xorriso, but about the set of
command-line opt
Attached is an updated patch that works on top of 4.0.4 (change needed
to replace LIVE_IMAGE_ARCHITECTURE with LB_ARCHITECTURES).
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, jnqnfe wrote:
> "After includes/hooks because it copies in efi.img files that can be
> overriden by binary_includes and modified by binary_hooks"
>
> Do you have examples of existing hooks/includes which actually clash
> with the new files?
In Kali we use both of those f
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, jnqnfe wrote:
> What about the local config support provided? I.e placing a custom copy
> of the default syslinux config files into config/bootloaders/${_BOOTLOADER}.
>
> Were you aware that this functionality existed? Is it sufficient for
> your needs, or if not, how specific
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -1 apt-ftparchive call fails with releases unknown to
live-build
Control: severity -1 normal
I'm cloning this bug because the suggestion to retrieve the
version from the Release file should not be lost (the version is used in
multiple places, not only in the
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 19:46 +1100, Michael . wrote:
>
> > Just incase no one already know this there is a version of Live-Build
> > that supports UEFI.
> > Kali Linux developer (also Debian Developer) Raphael Hertzog has
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Paul Wise wrote:
> Since live-build is now orphaned, you'll need to join the Debian Live
> team to get access to the repo and then commit the UEFI support.
I know that and I already have git commit access. In fact, I have already
used it to merge all our other changes.
We wil
Hi Iain,
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> This is orphaned and while maintained upstream does appear to have had a name
> change and is now packaged as open-infrastructure-system-build (which is nice
> and easy to type).
I have been maintaining live-build in git to keep it an worki
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On the latter I can't really comment, but I would find it very
> unfortunate if this package would get removed from stretch *now*… (where
> there is no time to develop a replacement…)
Why would anyone develop a replacement instead of taking it over?
In
On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, cittadinoeuro...@aol.com wrote:
> I periodically build a debian/stretch/amd64 system and all is OK until
> september 2016.
> I have some packages .deb into into directory config/packages.chroot
>
> After september 2016 live build fail.
This is fixed in git, I intend to uplo
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016, Ronny Standtke wrote:
> Package: live-boot
> Version: 1:20160511
> Severity: normal
>
> If a preferred medium (device or medium type) is given with the
> live-media parameter then waiting for the timeout to expire before
> scanning for these devices is not necessary. Just
Hello,
On Sun, 19 Jun 2016, Eugenio 'g7' Paolantonio wrote:
> The After=local-fs.target rule introduced in commit 63ab809 made systemd
> go in timeout while waiting for the local-fs target to be reached.
>
> This is due to the fact that the Before= rule in the live-config unit
> prevents the star
On Wed, 08 Mar 2017, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
> a broken symlink.
[...]
> /usr/share/live/build/bootloaders/extlinux/hdt.c32 ->
> /usr/lib/syslinux/modules/bios/hdt.c32
>
> Are you missing a Depends/Recommends/Suggests?
Not
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Ronny Standtke wrote:
> ...produced an ISO image where the GNOME desktop doesn't appear but gdm3
> just keeps crashing for quite a while until the system drops to a text
> console.
>
> I tested both ISO files in VirtualBox. Can you reproduce the problem or
> is there something
81 matches
Mail list logo
