internet no debian live

2011-05-19 Thread possiventura perhappiness
olá, gostaria de saber como configuro a internet no debian live ( dsl ) ? tadeu filippini p.s. to configure network ( DSL ) is what i want to know how . my regards ( saudações )

Re: internet no debian live

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/19/2011 10:27 AM, possiventura perhappiness wrote: > gostaria de saber como configuro a internet no debian live ( dsl ) ? > tadeu filippini this is an english mailing list, please write in english. Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email:

Bug#619945: marked as done (needs volatile update for wheezy)

2011-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2011 11:47:19 +0200 with message-id <4dd4e727.2000...@progress-technologies.net> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #619945, regarding needs volatile update for wheezy to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#626900: marked as done (live-build: add support for Ubuntu oneiric)

2011-05-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 19 May 2011 11:47:19 +0200 with message-id <4dd4e727.2000...@progress-technologies.net> and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #626900, regarding live-build: add support for Ubuntu oneiric to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#627187: live-boot-initramfs-tools: No support for IPv6 in debian-live network boot

2011-05-19 Thread Michal Suchanek
Excerpts from Daniel Baumann's message of Wed May 18 18:17:28 +0200 2011: > On 05/18/2011 05:05 PM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > > However, this still has to be addressed in live-boot once an alternative > > tool is available or ipconfig supports IPv6. > > right, but there's no point in having a bug u

Bug#627183: live-build: minimal hook doesn't seem appropriate for Ubuntu

2011-05-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:47:51PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 05/18/2011 03:43 PM, Colin Watson wrote: > >it would be quite a hassle for us to rename our existing task now. > > it's not nice to rename it for debian too; however.. > > >There doesn't seem to be any way to exclude a hook that

Bug#627332: update mlocate database?

2011-05-19 Thread Colin Watson
Package: live-build Version: 3.0~a17-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu ubuntu-patch oneiric Our current Ubuntu live filesystem builder updates the mlocate database in the squashfs. This is convenient because you get to use locate in the l

Bug#627332: update mlocate database?

2011-05-19 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Colin Watson wrote (19 May 2011 16:04:17 GMT) : > Do you think that it would be OK to do this by default (see attached > patch), or do you want it to be more configurable? I'm no live-build maintainer, but any proposal of adding more to lb_chroot_hacks makes me a bit nervous and think of othe

Bug#627332: update mlocate database?

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/19/2011 10:01 PM, intrigeri wrote: any proposal of adding more to lb_chroot_hacks makes me a bit nervous and think of other ways to achieve the same result. ack, however.. E.g. wouldn't it be nicer to add a (low-priority, disabled by default) debconf option to mlocate, that would update

Bug#627332: update mlocate database?

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 05/19/2011 06:04 PM, Colin Watson wrote: This is convenient because you get to use locate in the live session without having to wait for updatedb, and because after you install the system it doesn't have to do very much work to update the locate database nice. The trade-off is that the dat

Bug#627332: update mlocate database?

2011-05-19 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:01:22PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > Colin Watson wrote (19 May 2011 16:04:17 GMT) : > > Do you think that it would be OK to do this by default (see attached > > patch), or do you want it to be more configurable? > > I'm no live-build maintainer, but any proposal of adding

Bug#627332: update mlocate database?

2011-05-19 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Colin Watson wrote (19 May 2011 20:39:53 GMT) : > There's no particular guarantee that mlocate.postinst runs > sufficiently late in the process for the locate database to be > reasonably complete (it would probably be after the bulk of files > have been unpacked, but it would really be better