[ resending (parts of it), apparently the previous mail didn't make it ]
joseangon wrote:
> Disk /dev/hda: 4327 MB, 4327464960 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 526 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x00044ed4
>
>Device Boot Start
joseangon wrote:
> in order to help you with your problem (which i guess is the well-known
> #565456), you need to give the full partition list, including the used
> filesystems.
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 4327 MB, 4327464960 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 526 cylinders
> Units = cylinde
2010/1/22 Daniel Baumann
joseangon wrote:
> > in order to help you with your problem (which i guess is the
> well-known
> > #565456), you need to give the full partition list, including the
> used
> > filesystems.
> >
> > Disk /dev/hda: 4327 MB, 4327464960 bytes
> > 255 heads, 63 sec
On 21/01/2010 10:39, Daniel Baumann wrote:
my backports are since a while in their definitive and permanent
location on backports.debian-maintainers.org (undebian.org is a testbed
for different things).
my buildds were busy building openoffice.org et al, the kernels will
follow in about a week or
joseangon wrote:
> /dev/hda1: UUID="21ff00f5-25cc-4232-a773-1363042a29ed" SEC_TYPE="ext2"
> TYPE="ext3"
[...]
> /dev/hdb13: UUID="5dcce6ab-2096-4a6a-ad46-d57b4e5b83f6" SEC_TYPE="ext2"
> TYPE="ext3"
those are all supported filesystems, so i don't see why it should fail
to boot in the first place.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 565456 pending
Bug #565456 [live-initramfs] fails in persistency mode and unknown fs
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
tag 541493 moreinfo
thanks
why?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 541493 moreinfo
Bug #541493 [live-initramfs] live-initramfs: Bug in where_is_mounted()
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tag 565456 pending
thanks
fixed in git.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian
Tom Deblauwe wrote:
>> unrelated to that; you might also get luck by using backports from
>> backports.org.
>
> My search only shows 2.6.30 packages there.
ah, ok. those are not usable as they miss the required modules and meta
packages.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH
Chris,
any comment from you on the issue?
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-r
Package: live-helper
Version: 2.0~a4-1
Severity: normal
When building an image based on the eeepc-live config I get messages
like:
Unpacking squashfs-tools (from .../squashfs-tools_1%3a4.0-6_i386.deb)
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up squashfs-tools (1:4.0-6) ...
Parallel mksqua
* Daniel Baumann wrote:
[...]
> As a first step, I'd like to gather a list of features (not their
> implementation!, that's a step later) that you need/want/like/use/miss
> from live-initramfs. So please also list things that the current
> live-initramfs does. If possible, please send in your lis
Michael Prokop wrote:
> Addon: the network configuration should be made more flexible and
> robust. I've been working on this recently, see:
> http://grml.supersized.org/archives/337-More-robust-network-booting.html
thanks for the pointer, for me it's about implementation, so i'll take
it up in th
On 19/01/2010 17:09, Daniel Baumann wrote:
As a first step, I'd like to gather a list of features (not their
implementation!, that's a step later) that you need/want/like/use/miss
from live-initramfs.
Here are the things I was thinking about:
- You should be able to boot a live system and it s
Tom Deblauwe wrote:
> - You should be able to boot a live system and it should be able to
> mount certain partitions that it reads from some config file in the
> binary filesystem.
that live-initramfs mounts certain partitions automatically means, that
/etc/fstab needs to have a configuration mech
Pls consider the following patches implementing grub support when
creating usb-hdd disk images.
The second patch introduces some additional modifications preventing the
parted errors, but requires parted to support disk images directly. I
wonder if this is available in all systems live-helper
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> (and how cool would be an rsyncrypto, where you can have your
> persistency on an untrusted server?)
indeed, added to the list.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: ht
Michal Suchanek wrote:
> I was just wondering what would happen when you boot 100 d-ls that use
> the same network persistency location.
fedora afaik supports that, i'm really not sure about that, but i think
i remember that they do it by appending the mac to the name of the share
to avoid that pr
19 matches
Mail list logo
