Hi everyone,
I would like to remove aufs from Debian soon, as it is not maintained
upstream anymore. But before this can happen, we have to find an
alternative which provides a reasonable feature set and comparable
performance.
This email is sent to the debian-kernel team for advice on the
kernel
Hello Julian,
On Monday 06 July 2009, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> -
> It seems to be the best idea to use unionfs-fuse for now (like Ubuntu)
> until a new kernel-based solution has been packaged. It may also be a
> good idea to coordinate this with the Ubuntu developers, so both distros
>
Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Proposal
> -
> It seems to be the best idea to use unionfs-fuse for now (like Ubuntu)
> until a new kernel-based solution has been packaged. It may also be a
> good idea to coordinate this with the Ubuntu developers, so both distros
> can use the same method of
Bernd Schubert wrote:
> I also would like to get involved into the Debian Live project then
very easy and welcome.. please clone
git://git.debian.net/git/debian-live/live-initramfs.git and send patches.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: danie
unfortunately, i did not pass all exams, so i'll have to redo the whole
thing. that will take place (tentatively) on 25th to 29th august. means:
* until then i'm learning during business hours, and doing debian stuff
only on the evenings.
* unsure about debcamp/debconf attendance (will decide u
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> in the meanwhile, having not looked at the issues myself at all, is it
> reasonably possible to patch aufs1 for 2.6.30?
I have already compiled it against 2.6.30 using the current version in unstable,
but I have not tested the module yet. It s
