Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Proposal > --------- > It seems to be the best idea to use unionfs-fuse for now (like Ubuntu) > until a new kernel-based solution has been packaged. It may also be a > good idea to coordinate this with the Ubuntu developers, so both distros > can use the same method of filesystem unification. > > 1. The Debian Live project adds support for unionfs-fuse.
this shouldn't be that hard, however, it's a serious regression in terms of speed, therefore i really hope kernel team will accepts aufs2 patches. > 2. A new filesystem will be packaged (unionfs2 OR aufs2). > 3. aufs will be removed from unstable (or be replaced by > aufs2 under the same name). in the meanwhile, having not looked at the issues myself at all, is it reasonably possible to patch aufs1 for 2.6.30? -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
