Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-15 Thread Daniel Baumann
please distinguish between build bugs and unrelated runtime bugs. for bugs during build time, live-build needs to be fixed. for bugs during runtime (including installation time), almost always the bugs are within the distribution itself, not in live-build. in such cases, there's no fix for tha

Re: Re: Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-15 Thread Robert Key
Concerning the casper, install, dists, pool dirs on a ext4 partition booted from grub2 I found the the following: install fails as "cdrom not found" message appears as I said before. One can drop to a shell and mount /dev/sdb2 /cdrom (grub2 is on sdb1, casper on sdb2). Then return to "load in

Re: Re: Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-14 Thread Robert Key
I have verified the following: 1. When building in ubuntu mode usb-hdd image with debian-installer and live option for the d-i the boot parameter "cdrom-detect/try-usb=true" is NOT included in live.cfg in the syslinux directory. I think it should be there or else it tries to find the d-i files

Re: Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-14 Thread Robert Key
Yes I do mean the d-i images, sorry NOT the cd image. There is a dists and pool directory with the d-i images. They are copied from the archive towards the end of the build after the squashed file system is made. Also I have only build using the usb-hdd image. This is where the parameter cdro

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 12/14/2010 07:50 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote: Daniel: Feel free to update the default for Ubuntu to just have this disabled by default for Ubuntu for all releases. done in git, thanks. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@

Re: Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-14 Thread Cody A.W. Somerville
Hi Robert, Your help in testing the Ubuntu support is greatly appreciated. On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Robert Key wrote: > Hi and thanks Cody, you doing the patch is fine. > > There are other important issues all be it simple: > > 1. For the udebs there must be a soft link to maverick and

Re: Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-14 Thread Robert Key
Hi and thanks Cody, you doing the patch is fine. There are other important issues all be it simple: 1. For the udebs there must be a soft link to maverick and lucid ( or any other ubuntu distributions) in the directory: /usr/share/live/build/data/debian-cd that points to squeeze. Without t

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 12/13/2010 05:02 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: yes, i'll commit them later today to the data directory within live-build. done. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 12/13/2010 09:26 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote: 1. lb_binary_debian-installer changes required: I've attached a patch to fix the package names to be used for Ubuntu for all arches in lb_binary_debian-installer. applied. 2. lb_binary_disk changes required: Daniel: Do you have

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-13 Thread Cody A.W. Somerville
Hi Folks, On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Robert Key wrote: > I have solved the issues with using ubuntu mode and the debian installer as > follows: > > 1. lb_binary_debian-installer changes required: > > The script /usr/share/live/build/scripts/build/lb_binary_debian-installer > uses the wrong

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 12/13/2010 03:41 PM, Cody A.W. Somerville wrote: Daniel: Are you fine with just grabbing and adding them from the bzr branch at lp:~ubuntu-cdimage/debian-cd/ubuntu/ ? As you probably could guess, I can't provide a patch due to binary files. yes, i'll commit them later today to the data direc

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-13 Thread Cody A.W. Somerville
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:59 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 12/08/2010 11:59 AM, Robert Key wrote: > >> I have solved the issues with using ubuntu mode and the debian installer >> as follows: >> > > thanks; can you please provide a patch? unrelated to that, i asked cody to > have a look at it, en

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 12/12/2010 11:39 AM, Robert Key wrote: Will do Daniel. I have made patches before, but will need a little time to check it out. I will definitely meet your deadline. great; let me know if you have any troubles. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email:

Re: Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-12 Thread Robert Key
Will do Daniel. I have made patches before, but will need a little time to check it out. I will definitely meet your deadline. I am a software developer and wouldn't mind getting involved with live-build, I really think it is a cool idea. The live-initramfs seems to be a much better option than

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-12 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 12/08/2010 11:59 AM, Robert Key wrote: I have solved the issues with using ubuntu mode and the debian installer as follows: thanks; can you please provide a patch? unrelated to that, i asked cody to have a look at it, end of next week we'll probably upload the last live-build version for s

Re: [SOLVED] Some issues with live-build 2.0.7-1 in ubuntu mode

2010-12-08 Thread Robert Key
I have solved the issues with using ubuntu mode and the debian installer as follows: 1. lb_binary_debian-installer changes required: The script /usr/share/live/build/scripts/build/lb_binary_debian-installer uses the wrong name for the linux-image. It tries to install linux-image-2.6-generic f