Re: [PATCH] support for newer grub-common package

2011-01-17 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 01/14/2011 09:03 PM, Luigi Capriotti wrote: > isn't LB_BUILD_CHROOT respected by means of the lines following the > patch, where the created "binary.sh" is executed with or without chroot > accordingly? yes, absolutely. applied as discussed with you on irc, thank you. -- Address:Danie

Re: [PATCH] support for newer grub-common package

2011-01-14 Thread Luigi Capriotti
isn't LB_BUILD_CHROOT respected by means of the lines following the patch, where the created "binary.sh" is executed with or without chroot accordingly? On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 01/14/2011 05:50 PM, Luigi Capriotti wrote: > > The attached patch checks if the n

Re: [PATCH] support for newer grub-common package

2011-01-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 01/14/2011 05:50 PM, Luigi Capriotti wrote: > The attached patch checks if the new format specifier is supported and > calls grub-mkimage accordingly. thanks, however, it does call grub stuff from the host system which can be or can not be the same as the target system. therefore, could you pl

[PATCH] support for newer grub-common package

2011-01-14 Thread Luigi Capriotti
Hello, Please accept this simple patch that fixes building ISOs using grub2. A recent change in grub-common pachage, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584415, has mandated the use of a destination format in calls to grub-mkimage, parameter that was not previously supported.