isn't LB_BUILD_CHROOT respected by means of the lines following the patch, where the created "binary.sh" is executed with or without chroot accordingly?
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Baumann <dan...@debian.org> wrote: > On 01/14/2011 05:50 PM, Luigi Capriotti wrote: > > The attached patch checks if the new format specifier is supported and > > calls grub-mkimage accordingly. > > thanks, however, it does call grub stuff from the host system which can > be or can not be the same as the target system. > > therefore, could you please update it to respect, conditionally, > LB_BUILD_CHROOT and greps for the parameter in chroot/ ? > > > Regards, > Daniel > > -- > Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist > Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net > Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d307f52.3010...@debian.org > >
