Re: EFI BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Steve, Thanks for the summary of the EFI BoF. If you don't mind, I'm going to piggy-back on this to provide a bit more info about Secure Boot. Some of this is just expanding on your notes with clarifications; other bits are new information I've gleaned while attending the UEFI Summer Summit t

Bug#544192: marked as done (Please add debian-live pseudo package)

2012-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:35:12 -0700 with message-id <20120721013512.gu32...@rzlab.ucr.edu> and subject line Re: Bug#544192: Please add debian-live pseudo package has caused the Debian Bug report #544192, regarding Please add debian-live pseudo package to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#544192: Please add debian-live pseudo package

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/21/2012 02:59 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > I understand now that you aren't planning on ever wanting to use it as a > package name, yes. > but it also means that no one else will ever be able to use it as a > package name. that's ok. in the past six years, we have consistently used 'debian

Re: Bug#544192: Please add debian-live pseudo package

2012-07-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 07/21/2012 12:31 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > > The last time I touched this, no one had decided what the name of the > > actual pseudo package was going to be. See > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544192#25 > > why exactly is 'debi

Bug#544192: Please add debian-live pseudo package

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/21/2012 12:31 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > The last time I touched this, no one had decided what the name of the > actual pseudo package was going to be. See > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544192#25 why excately is 'debian-live' not ideal? we already ruled your suspicion of

Re: debian-cd BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:01:37PM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: >On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >> Here's a summary of what we discussed in the debian-cd BoF [1] last >> week (9th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video >> team, the video of the session is a

Processed: Re: Please add debian-live pseudo package

2012-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > outlook 544192 Need the proper name of the pseudopackage; debian-live is not > ideal. live.debian.org or live.debian.net? Outlook recorded from message bug 544192 message > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistan

Bug#544192: Please add debian-live pseudo package

2012-07-20 Thread Don Armstrong
outlook 544192 Need the proper name of the pseudopackage; debian-live is not ideal. live.debian.org or live.debian.net? thanks On Sat, 21 Jul 2012, Daniel Baumann wrote: > after re-reading again trough this bug as i do every year that's passing > by.. > > as the tag moreinfo suggests, what exact

EFI BoF at DebConf

2012-07-20 Thread Steve McIntyre
[ Please note the cross-post and Reply-To ] Hi folks, Here's a summary of what we discussed in the EFI BoF [1] last week (9th July). Thanks to the awesome efforts of the DebConf video team, the video of the session is already online [2] in case you missed it. I've also attached the Gobby notes th

Bug#544192: Please add debian-live pseudo package

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi, after re-reading again trough this bug as i do every year that's passing by.. as the tag moreinfo suggests, what exactely is left open that you require to know from us in order to be able to create the pseudo package? Regards, Daniel -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-

live-build_3.0~a54-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-07-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: live-build-cgi_3.0~a54-1_all.deb to main/l/live-build/live-build-cgi_3.0~a54-1_all.deb live-build_3.0~a54-1.debian.tar.xz to main/l/live-build/live-build_3.0~a54-1.debian.tar.xz live-build_3.0~a54-1.dsc to main/l/live-build/live-build_3.0~a54-1.dsc live-build_3.0~a54-1_all.deb

Processing of live-build_3.0~a54-1_i386.changes

2012-07-20 Thread Debian FTP Masters
live-build_3.0~a54-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: live-build_3.0~a54-1.dsc live-build_3.0~a54.orig.tar.xz live-build_3.0~a54-1.debian.tar.xz live-build_3.0~a54-1_all.deb live-build-cgi_3.0~a54-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Bug#682180: marked as done (live-build: fix build.sh path)

2012-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:33:46 +0200 with message-id <50095e3a.4070...@progress-technologies.net> and subject line Re: Bug#682180: live-build: fix build.sh path has caused the Debian Bug report #682180, regarding live-build: fix build.sh path to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#682180: live-build: fix build.sh path

2012-07-20 Thread Daniel Baumann
this is fixed (differently) in git already, but thanks ;) -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-