On 07/21/2012 12:31 AM, Don Armstrong wrote: > The last time I touched this, no one had decided what the name of the > actual pseudo package was going to be. See > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544192#25
why excately is 'debian-live' not ideal? we already ruled your suspicion of 'that could potentially be a package name' out, it isn't a package name and never will be (debian-live tools are named live-* on purpose, so that they are derivatives friendly). if you insist on not using debian-live as name within the bts for a pseudo-package, can we have live.debian.org then? if we can't have live.debian.org without having the url first, let's have live.debian.net then, as this is what we use since many years consistently anywhere anyways. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5009fb21.50...@progress-technologies.net
