Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 14/07/11 06:39 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 07/14/2011 07:06 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: >> if you do both arches from the same tree there would be a risk that one >> image is >> "tainted" with stuff from the wrong arch if you didn't take care. > > provided that one does a) ensure the generated

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/14/2011 07:06 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > if you do both arches from the same tree there would be a risk that one image > is > "tainted" with stuff from the wrong arch if you didn't take care. provided that one does a) ensure the generated config files in config/ are removed in auto/clean, b

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/14/2011 06:28 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Daniel meant to say "best to not do different architectures from the > same config tree" I am sure. actualy not, i am indeed building all architectures (and even multiple distributions) from the same config tree. each of my configs (client-gnome, ser

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Ellison
On 11-07-14 01:06 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: Does that sound like the behaviour expected from archive issues? More like a completely broken archive mirror (or broken apt caching proxy). I was using: --mirror-bootstrap http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/ --parent-mirror-bootstrap http://ft

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 07/14/2011 02:06 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > ARCHES=i386 lb config > > and in auto/config > > ARCHES="${ARCHES:-amd64}" > lb config \ > --architectures ${ARCHES} \ > etc. Come to think of it, that's probably a bad idea, as you will invariably forget which tree you're in and build the wron

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 07/14/2011 01:47 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote: > Ah, I suspected that was a typo. That's why I emphasized that I was > indeed doing that. :) So generally people have a completely separate > config setup for each architecture? Isn't that a lot of duplication? I don't know what people generally do. I

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Ellison
On 11-07-14 12:28 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: Daniel meant to say "best to not do different architectures from the same config tree" I am sure. Ah, I suspected that was a typo. That's why I emphasized that I was indeed doing that. :) So generally people have a completely separate config setup fo

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 07/14/2011 01:22 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote: > On 11-07-14 11:30 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: >> i think i already mentioned to you at another occasion on this list, >> it's best to do different architectures from the same config tree. > Btw, I > _am_ trying to do different architectures from the sam

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Ellison
On 11-07-14 11:30 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote: i think i already mentioned to you at another occasion on this list, it's best to do different architectures from the same config tree. That wasn't me, I believe. You did point me to this URL: git://vcs.progress-linux.org/images/client-gnome.git

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 07/14/2011 02:50 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote: > Thanks Ben. I'll take another look at the docs. I've read the whole > thing a couple of times, but I find that parts become clearer after a > bit of experience with the scripts, so a re-read might help. i think i already mentioned to you at another o

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Ellison
On 11-07-14 08:30 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote: On 07/08/2011 05:22 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote: Hi all, I've successfully created amd64 ISOs several times. When I want to do the same for i386, I change "--architectures" to i386 and do lb clean --purge; lb config; lb build I don't know if the depend

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Ben Armstrong
On 07/08/2011 05:22 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote: > Hi all, > > I've successfully created amd64 ISOs several times. When I want to do > the same for i386, I change "--architectures" to i386 and do > > lb clean --purge; lb config; lb build I don't know if the dependency issues directly relate to this

Re: Can't create an i386 ISO, but amd64 works fine

2011-07-14 Thread Daniel Ellison
On 11-07-08 04:22 PM, Daniel Ellison wrote: The ISO is created with no errors when I set "--architectures" to amd64 and do the same set of commands. Is there anything I'm doing obviously wrong? I can provide my auto/config, syrinx.list etc. if needed. Any ideas on this? it's really bugging me

troubles with kernel 3.0-rc6: + panic mount unionfs-fuse on /root/ failed with option -o cow ...

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Schneider
Hello, Because the standard wheezy kernel 2.6.39-2 doesn't support some xen options (like xen-pciback.hide) I have tried to use kernel 3.0-rc6 on the live image instead. The iso live image was created (on wheezy/current lb3) however there is an error (s. below) during the boot and I am gett