On 07/14/2011 06:28 PM, Ben Armstrong wrote: > Daniel meant to say "best to not do different architectures from the > same config tree" I am sure.
actualy not, i am indeed building all architectures (and even multiple distributions) from the same config tree. each of my configs (client-gnome, server-lxc, standard), the common thing is that they all require the same live-build version, but otherwise, all architectures and all distributions (stable, stable-backports, unstable) are build from the per flavour specific config tree. while this is nice to keep everything that belongs together (per flavour) in one place centrally, i do agree (and this is what i think Ben was going for) that this is quite fragile and should probably not be the standard recommendation. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e1f6087.4080...@progress-technologies.net
