On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:38:55PM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
>Hi Vincent,
>
>
>> There may already be a similar check for debian/[README|TODO].Debian
>
>Which tag are you referring to, please?
>
I'm sorry, I don't know of one. I was just speculating that lintian
may have a check like this.
Kind
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 6:33 PM Vincent McIntyre wrote:
>
> The reason for this appears to be longstanding, see bug 429510.
>
> This issue may go away with a later debhelper compatibility level
> but since it's been around since 2007, perhaps it's worth a lintian rule.
>
> Perhaps lint
Your message dated Wed, 4 Dec 2019 04:15:12 +
with message-id <20191204041512.GA1372824@blodeuwedd>
and subject line Re: Bug#946075: warn about node packages not in javascript
section
has caused the Debian Bug report #946075,
regarding warn about node packages not in javascript section
to be m
Package: lintian
Version: 2.39.0
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
unison (2.48.4-3) was released without an important note in the NEWS file.
The note was in the package source, but not included in the binary package.
See bug 946041.
The reason for this appears to be longstanding, see bug 4295
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 630186 lintian/2.4.3
Bug #630186 {Done: Changwoo Ryu } [lintian] sunpinyin-utils:
shlib-calls-exit
Marked as found in versions lintian/2.4.3 and reopened.
> fixed 630186 lintian/2.5.3
Bug #630186 [lintian] sunpinyin-utils: shlib-calls-exit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 630186 lintian
Bug #630186 {Done: Changwoo Ryu } [sunpinyin-utils]
sunpinyin-utils: shlib-calls-exit
Bug reassigned from package 'sunpinyin-utils' to 'lintian'.
No longer marked as found in versions sunpinyin/2.0.3-2.
Ignoring request to
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 01:36:18PM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:03 AM Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, it's all driven by the lintian table in UDD. :-)
>
> Are you able to cross-reference debug packages (#874017), or are you
> not looking at them?
I'm currently not
Hi Jelmer,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:03 AM Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> Thanks, it's all driven by the lintian table in UDD. :-)
Are you able to cross-reference debug packages (#874017), or are you
not looking at them?
> The common issue
> appears to be people copy-n-pasting license texts that con
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 20:41:17 +
Source: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.40.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers
Changed-By: Chris Lamb
Closes: 945869 945891
Changes:
lintian_2.40.0_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.40.0.dsc
lintian_2.40.0.tar.xz
lintian_2.40.0_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.40.0 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.40.0
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Your message dated Tue, 03 Dec 2019 21:19:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#945891: fixed in lintian 2.40.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #945891,
regarding lintian: please update list of DEB_BUILD_PROFILES
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Tue, 03 Dec 2019 21:19:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#945869: fixed in lintian 2.40.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #945869,
regarding lintian: false positive for debian-rules-not-executable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 21:32:24 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.39.0~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Mai
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 21:34:12 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Built-For-Profiles: nocheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.39.0~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Mai
lintian_2.39.0~bpo9+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.39.0~bpo9+1.dsc
lintian_2.39.0~bpo9+1.tar.xz
lintian_2.39.0~bpo9+1_all.deb
lintian_2.39.0~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.39.0_bpo9+1 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.39.0_bpo9+1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
lintian_2.39.0~bpo10+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lintian_2.39.0~bpo10+1.dsc
lintian_2.39.0~bpo10+1.tar.xz
lintian_2.39.0~bpo10+1_all.deb
lintian_2.39.0~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.d
Chris Lamb pushed new tag 2.39.0_bpo10+1 at lintian / lintian
--
View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/tree/2.39.0_bpo10+1
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 946075 + moreinfo
Bug #946075 [lintian] warn about node packages not in javascript section
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
946075: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep
tags 946075 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Jelmer,
> It would be great if lintian could warn about node-* packages that are not in
> the javascript section of the archive. A lot of packages are currently in the
> "web" section.
As I understand it, it already does:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lint
Hi Felix,
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:02:17PM -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> First of all, thank you for D-Janitor. We look forward to learning
> more about it and would like to support your efforts.
Thanks, it's all driven by the lintian table in UDD. :-)
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 8:30 PM Jelmer Ve
Package: lintian
Version: 2.39.0
Severity: wishlist
It would be great if lintian could warn about node-* packages that are not in
the javascript section of the archive. A lot of packages are currently in the
"web" section.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
23 matches
Mail list logo