Re: Question about license compatibility

2005-09-01 Thread Jordan Abel
Hope to have answered to your question. I am sorry but I did not succeedin asking Berkeley's Regents for a license change. Didn't they issue a blanket license change for _all_ code owned by them under the old bsd license?

Re: Sun Java available from non-free

2006-05-24 Thread Jordan Abel
On 5/22/06, Anthony Towns wrote: The questions asked weren't "Is this okay for non-free?" it's "Did you mean or when you wrote ?". The answers to those latter questions are, ttbomk, all included in the FAQ, which is why ignoring it just wastes everyone's time. If the FAQ weren't

Re: GPL violates DFSG point 3

2006-06-01 Thread Jordan Abel
On 6/1/06, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 6/1/06, Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The GPL is not "completely unmodifiable", you just have limitations >> on how you may modify it and still use i

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-08 Thread Jordan Abel
On Apr 8, 2005 2:44 AM, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:50:54AM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > > Wrong! It is perfectly legal in the United States, and I'm pretty > > sure in your country, to distribute or redistribute copyrighted > > works. Otherwise there