On 5/22/06, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
The questions asked weren't "Is this okay for non-free?" it's "Did you mean ____ or ____ when you wrote ____?". The answers to those latter questions are, ttbomk, all included in the FAQ, which is why ignoring it just wastes everyone's time.
If the FAQ weren't so obviously full of lies, maybe it wouldn't be ignored. That said, (IANAL) the people who have said on this thread that the estoppel thing doesn't apply outside the US or whatever seem to be ignoring the choice of law clause.
