Fwd: Copyright license on some of your files on figlet

Am I correct? Is his e-mail reply enough to liberate the non-free parts of figlet? [ Please Cc: me on replies ] Thanks, Carlos. -- Forwarded message -- From: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:52:35 -0300 Subject: Re: Copyright license on some o

Academic Free License 2.1 -- free or not?

by law, and Licensor promises not to interfere with or be responsible for such uses by You. This license is Copyright (C) 2003-2004 Lawrence E. Rosen. All rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to copy and distribute this license without modification. This license may not be modified without the express written permission of its copyright owner. -- EOL -- -- Carlos Laviola [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fwd: figlet license change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0?

change from Artistic to Clarified Artistic or Artistic 2.0? To: Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Ian Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christiaan Keet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Disclaimer: IANAL, but I have talked extensively wi

Re: Academic Free License 2.1 -- free or not?

On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:43:16 +0200, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S.: No need to Cc: (or To:) me, as I'm a debian-legal subscriber. > Instead, I'm Cc:ing Carlos Laviola, since he asked to be Cc:ed > (or did you subscribe in the meanwhile

Re: Academic Free License 2.1 -- free or not?

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 23:39:56 +0200, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:00:28 -0300 Carlos Laviola wrote: > > Maybe > > when Christiaan, the current FIGlet maintainer, comes back from > > vacation and release a new version with the license

License for fortunes?

ading this in -legal, please Cc: to me ] Thanks, Carlos - -- carlos laviola - icq #55799523 $ chown us:us /your_base -R chown: what you say!! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE63cUHZAYCJzUW03IRAsQXAJ9X6PSzrJMdApjZ

Re: License for fortunes?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 18-Apr-2001 David Starner wrote: > [This is a legal question; it belongs on debian-legal.] > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 01:48:17PM -0300, Carlos Laviola wrote: >> I was wondering if I could consider fortunes to be in public domain,

fortunes-atheist copyright again (would be FW: Re: copyright)

g this). Thanks. [nb. again, if you're subscribed to -legal and not to -devel, please Cc to me] - -FW: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:02:37 -0400 (EDT) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: (Carlos Laviola) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: copyright Hi Carlos-- Sorr