or most documents, source
code is pretty easy to define: images, your XCF or PSD source (if you
happen to use those formats), sound, your editor's project file, text,
your word processor or TeX source.
Andrew Donnellan
--
This space for rent. Enquire within. Terms and conditions apply. See
store for details.
Get free domains - http://www.ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
On 11/5/05, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:28:02PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > On 11/4/05, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
> > > > My main concern about this was that
Just to make myself clear: if you can't determine sourcecode you still
can't release under the GPL, even if you dual-license.
Andrew
On 11/5/05, Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:47:03AM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > >
> >
The GPL is not a contract, but one clause states that there must be
source code provided, so while a copyright holder can violate the GPL
by releasing under a different license, but the copyright holder can't
release under the GPL and at the same time violate the GPL.
Andrew
On 11/5/05, Arc <[EMA
On 11/5/05, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I don't understand the relevance. The preamble explains the FSF's
> goals in the GPL; it doesn't make promises on behalf of the licensor.
>
> If you did manage to convince people that the GPL could be used as a stick
> against the copyr
rce as long as the program doesn't
contain other GPL code. However person B could begin legal action over
a misleading deal.
Andrew
On 11/5/05, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:30:03PM -0600, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
> > On 11/4/05, He
Yes. I meant the copyright holder.
Andrew
On 11/6/05, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:28:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > I mean the *developer* must comply with both licenses, eg if you d/l
> > > under the GPL and MIT, then the developer must still put
Is this spam email spam? I would think that you couldn't really
copyright an email address. And who exactly is this spam from? If they
are requesting something they should be traceable. Also, are other
consultants getting the same? Is it really spam, or just heaps of
inappropriate requests?
Andrew
Does the crown copyright on the KJV affect other Commonwealth
countries e.g. Australia? Down here we have a Crown copyright law and
that covers *some* government material, including electoral
information, the NSW Higher School Certificate and a lot of other
things. Would British Crown Copyright doc
I've emailed finjan software asking for them to put the sourcecode up.
andrew
On 11/10/05, Alan Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > I can't find any mention of Debian in the documentation or their website
> >
> > There's no need for them to
I'll put any response on-list.
Also, yes, I have seen GPL Violations. I will contact them if finjan
doesn't respond.
Andrew
On 11/10/05, Arnoud Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > I've emailed finjan software aski
under crown copyright, because if there was no crown copyright,
then the government would hold normal copyright instead.
What's the situation in the UK?
Andrew
On 11/10/05, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:43:33PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
As the KJV was crown copyrighted in the 1600s, section 171 states that
unless crown privilege is explicitly repealed, the act does not affect
it.
According to Wikipedia the printing of the KJV is heavily controlled
by several institutions, eg Cambridge uni and oxford.
Maybe they could be contacte
> And your argument is flawed. God himself didn't directly author any
> part of the Bible at all. ;-) According to Christian doctrine, God
> *inspired* various people to write the *entire Bible*. According to
> Jewish doctrine, the same holds true for the Torah.
>
> The KJV of the Bible was orig
en
manually sent. I would just ignore it.
Andrew
On 11/17/05, Thomas Huriaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/11/2005):
> > Is this spam email spam? I would think that you couldn't really
> > copyright an email address. And
On 11/17/05, Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought spam was unsolicited email, automatic or not?
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
This would mean most email is spam, because most email is unsolicited.
However it's not spam because I agree to receive emails.
According to the Australia
> - Which text to include in the files? Is the following OK?
> * Author: xx yy
> * Copyright : xx yy, 2000-2005
> * License : GNU GPLv2 or later
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
On 11/22/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These sloppities lend support to the hypothesis that the exception was
> not drafted by the FSF's usual license advisors. Is it really FSF
> software?
>
Don't think so. For two main reasons:
1. GNU doesn't always mean FSF. Most GNU proje
Here are the requirements of the GPL:
You must either distribute the source code with the binaries, or you
must provide a written offer, for at least 3 years, that you will post
them the source code for ONLY the cost of media/shipping.
Images: There are a lot on the CD images page. See them.
And
So far: no response.
Has anyone else had any luck getting info from them?
andrew
On 11/10/05, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll put any response on-list.
>
> Also, yes, I have seen GPL Violations. I will contact them if finjan
> doesn't respond
On 11/24/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Andrew Donnellan
> > On 11/23/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Scripsit Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > In what way? The clause means the license of GNAT
On 11/25/05, Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 24 November 2005 20:42, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > On 11/24/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- snip --
> I don't think you understand. The restriction is on the removal of the
The outer ring of the spiral seems a fair bit wider than the Debian
logo. It seems to be just a textured spiral to me.
Andrew
On 11/28/05, Giannis Beredimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Yesterday I stumbled upon the site of Greece Information Society
> (http://www.infosoc.gr) and f
On 11/28/05, Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Giannis Beredimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> There are similarities in the shape that has been rolled up to form
> the spiral. The spiral itself differs, though. The Greek spiral has
> about 2.5 revolutions, while the Debial logo has
The webforms are compulsory *for downloading the software from their
site*. Doesn't affect the package in any way at all though.
andrew
On 11/30/05, Andrey Romanenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 16:52, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > We are seeking advice on h
Yes, as far as I know. Which is why we have servers all over the world
(USA, NL, DE, AU, etc.) where there are less restrictions :)
andrew
On 12/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a question about the standard Debian Distribution in relation to the
> U.S. E
On 12/20/05, Samuel Mimram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear debian-legal,
>
> [Please keep Hugo and I in CC, we're not subscribed to the list]
>
> I have two questions for you.
>
> 1. Coq upstream has agreed to put a license on the documentation
> (reproduced at the end of the mail). This would cl
In some countries the LZW patent has expired. In 2006, I believe, the
rest of the patents expire. I think the software can be safely
packaged by now.
andrew
On 12/23/05, Gürkan Sengün <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi
>
> please can you comment these two?
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-wnpp/200
On 12/21/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Cameron Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > * Any form of redistribution which connects to the published Team XLink
> > Orbital Server list resource, for Orbital Server aquisition, or otherwise,
> > or which interoperates with any exis
.
andrew
On 12/23/05, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 06:19:00PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > > > * Any form of redistribution which connects to the published Team
> > > > XLink
> > > > Orbital Server lis
Just say that it is licensed under the GPL and say that if you want to
use it in proprietary stuff then pay for a license.
e.g.
this program is free software - you can redistribute and/or modify it
etc etc.
If you want to use libpreludedb in a proprietary application contact
us for a license.
an
ks, but not on collective works. Beyond
> this fairly clear risk is any additional court finding concerning the
> GPL, for no one ever really knows what a court will decide.
>
> In any case the GPL will have been exposed as a paper tiger, the
> result of a too-wide stretchin
On 1/8/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/7/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That would be *really* easy to do. To relicense the
> > entire GPL codebase would mean every contributor to every GPL project
> > would have to
the program to me, but you will have to delete all of your own
copies.
This discussion is quite irrelevant - Alexander, if you have any
problems with the GPL that you want to be fixed, ask for them to be
discussed at the GPL3 conference. That's what it's for.
andrew
>
> regards,
-in-exchange unilateral permission to prepare derivative works
> and make copies, now it's time for 17 USC 109, dear Prof. Moglen.
>
> regards,
> alexander.
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
hed file). Does this
> mean I need to triple license this? What should I put in the Debian
> copyright file?
>
> Thanks for taking the time,
>
> Cameron Dale
>
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
not a free license.
>
> Who cares about your bet... but free as in what, BTW?
>
> regards,
> alexander.
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http:
It is public domain with a request to share modifications and share
for free. So it is DFSG-free.
Andrew
On 1/9/06, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems DFSG-free to me but who knows?
>
>
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://
27;t tried to hide from Yahoo!.
>
> My site doesn't use a dark color scheme like the "hacker" sites, either.
>
> But seriously, what do you think?
>
>
> --
> Chris Howie
> http://www.chrishowie.com
>
> -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
> V
On 1/9/06, Chris Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > I think that you could package the software, but it wouldn't be very
> > useful as anyone who uses it is violating the TOS. But if you can
> > create a server package for it, it
inks AFL and OSL are free, but very inconvienient (e.g.
the OSL's assent provision).
andrew
On 1/9/06, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 09:41:39PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > On 1/8/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't know. I don't know what that package does, and as p.d.o is
currently down I can't find out. Sorry.
Andrew
On 1/10/06, Chris Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > Not an interface that Yahoo provides. More an interface that Yahoo
&g
x27;d still like to comply with the GPL.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
> --
> /\/`) http://oooauthors.org
> /\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
> /\/_/
> \/_/I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
> /
>
>
&g
n distribution take?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.
> --
> /\/`) http://oooauthors.org
> /\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
> /\/_/
> \/_/I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
> /
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
g of value would be involved.
>
> Nah, that's for kids.
Out in Australia you have to have a licence to do that.
Andrew
>
> regards,
> alexander.
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
ister with every state.
Andrew
On 1/15/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/14/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/15/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 1/14/06, Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> (/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL) which is in English. The translation would
> only apply to the informational text above, leaving the full license
> intact.
>
> Would this already qualify as "re-licensing", which we obviously cannot do?
> Or merely a help to better
Yes.
andrew
On 1/16/06, Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 15 January 2006 21:12, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > I think you can, except the FSF requires that you place a notice, in
> > English, saying 'This is an unofficial translation and the original
ry scripts for Perl, Python, PHP,
etc., which are not in violation.
Andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user - http://debian.org
Get f
a Palm III or something that
does not have any of the network components available anymore. It does
pose problems for Debian too.
Andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - htt
of the notice. There seems to be nothing
> in 2(c) that implies that the notice cannot be given in the user's
> preferred language.
You could include a copy of the license notice in English and and allow them to both be viewed. I think that is safest.
Andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andr
> remember, I think it's cuba, iran, etc.) will be free in the US, but non
> free in the rest of the world, where no such clause are mandatory, but
> where adding it constitutes a *discrimination against some part of the
> population* ?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
ugh a computer network to request immediate transmission by
> HTTP of the complete source code of your modified version or other
> derivative work.
The affero clause seems to indicate that it only has to allow download
if the program is designed to run over a network - but what
icense agreement
> (let's assume acceptance arguendo) and is as irrelevant as another
> part ("#SEC4" link you seem to like so much) that follows the T&C.
>
> regards,
> alexander.
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jab
far as the kernel
> > is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not
> > v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.
>
> And how does that make it "impure" GPL? Permission to relicense
> under revised later versions is not par
it is designed as
a personal privacy program rather than a copyright enforcement
program.
andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user -
On 1/20/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/20/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are some (bad) parts in the linux kernel that are not GPL, and
> > even some parts which could be considered non-free. Look through the
&g
, the
> > preferred form for making modification to xblast graphics is the
> > corresponding povray files (unless they are on their turn automatically
> > generated from something else...).
>
> One useful point here is that there exist Free renderers for POVRay
> files, such as
ay's
> objects/textures/etc.
>
> --
> bye,
> pabs
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
>
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBD0crJ5Sc9mGvjxCMRAnIpAJ9e7IsFPVlljyOp5Nt8qvmH6xQrcwCgzawC
> xo7+d7Lue8bRezAagKlv7FY=
gt; Well, the definitely filed for it. Go to
> http://www.uspto.gov/main/trademarks.htm, click on "SEARCH trademarks",
> then "New User Search (Basic)", then search for 73478133 is "serial or
> registration number"
>
> It says there that it was "aband
ai raisonnable apr�s en avoir �t� inform�. En cas
> de
> r�silitation de tous vos droits pr�vus dans le pr�sent Contrat, vous vous
> engagez � ne plus utiliser et distribuer le Logiciel et la Documentation d�s
> que
> cela sera raisonnablement possible.
>
> 6. DROIT APPLICABLE ET A
On 1/26/06, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:30:32 +0100 Achim Bohnet wrote:
>
> > You may not modify the Documentation.
>
> As already pointed out by Andrew Donnellan, Documentation is non-free:
> it actually fails DFSG#3.
>
&g
minor discrimination, and not one which I think
deserves so much attention.
andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user - http://debian.
n
> of a few which appear to go to /dev/null.
>
> The FSF is, bizarrely, a top-down autocratic organization, with all the flaws
> that implies. Debian isn't, with all the benefits and flaws that implies.
>
Let's face it: Debian wouldn't exist without the FSF.
--
Andrew Donnell
;
(b) You initiate or threaten legal proceedings of any kind against Squiz.Net;
(c) Squiz.Net provides you with the Software under another licence,
for example a newer version of this Licence, and you agree to be bound
by its terms; or
(d) You and Squiz.Net agree in writing.
In the
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 11:47:39AM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > (a) You must not introduce any virus, worm, trojan horse or malicious
> > code into the Software;
>
> Free Software must allow transforming the software in any way, even ones
> which the author
) "because it's non-free". That's not a very
> persuasive argument. :)
>
> --
> Glenn Maynard
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Andrew Donn
MAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 12:32:25PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > > That's a matter of perspective, of course--Subversion is more important
> > > to me.
> >
> > Ever heard of G/LAMP? (GNU/Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Python/Perl) PHP
-
> National Manager - Special Projects
>
> < Sydney / Melbourne / Canberra / Hobart / London />
>2/340 Gore Street T: +61 (0) 3 9486 0411
>Fitzroy, VIC F: +61 (0) 3 9486 0611
>3202 W: http://www.squiz.net/
>
> .>> Open S
>On 10553 March 1977, Charles Fry wrote:
What the?
andrew
y exempt from State or Territory
law. Conversely, a service may be prohibited under the Commonwealth
Act, even if it is licensed or authorised under State or Territory
law." - and in NSW you need a permit.
andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blog
ot;, such as
> autoconf-doc. The following (untested) snippet should work:
>
> Package: *
> Pin: release c=non-free
> Pin-Priority: -1
>
> Package: autoconf-doc
> Pin: release c=non-free
> Pin-Priority: 500
>
> - Josh Triplett
>
>
>
>
--
Andrew D
OTNOTES_
>
>0. Foundation documents are best not amended via hand waving but
> rather via clear changes; I have no idea how we'd continue to vet
> licenses had the hand-waving passed.
>1. Not technically, but practically: -legal can't be overridden by GR
>
asures" as used in GFDL 2's "you may
Don't you mean 1.2?
andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user - http://deb
åns Rullgård
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECT
.org.uk/
>
> PGP key id 5EA01078
> 3412 EA18 1277 354B 991B C869 B219 7FDB 5EA0 1078
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonn
> /* 1.297 */ errmsgno(EX_BAD,
> /* 1.297 */ "original source from ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/\n";);
>
> }
> #endif
> }
> ---END QUOTE---
>
> For completeness, here's GPL 2c:
>
> ---BEGIN QUOTE---
> c) If the modified pro
On 3/19/06, Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why is he quoting the GPL *preamble*? Preambles aren't supposed to
> > have legal effect, are they?
>
> I guess JS is as thoroughly c
s Sun wouldn't like it).
Also considering the recent debate on the MPL would the CDDL even be
considered free?
andrew
On 4/7/06, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The language in the GPL seems quite ambiguous;
Or as Wouter pointed out on d-d port glibc.
andrew
On 4/7/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (d-l may give advice)
>
> So now that's sorted out really Nexenta needs an exemption from
> *every* copyright holder in dpkg, gcc, binutils, apt, coreutils, etc.
&g
I suppose porting glibc is quite important because it also minimises
the porting of everything else that may need to be adapted.
andrew
On 4/7/06, Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-06 23:19]:
>
> > Or as Wouter
mike
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL
;
> Thank you a lot for your help,
>
> --
> Charles Plessy
> Wako, Saitama, Japon
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnell
On 4/19/06, Seth David Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan writes:
>
> > Disclaiming a copyright means releasing into the public domain. (as in
> > no copyright at all). IANAL, but looking at what the license file
> > says, I would assume it to be cop
d a second opinion before raising the question to
> the development board of the software.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Roland
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Roland Marcus Rutschmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
ngers that we will not have to change it in
> > the future). We should also probably have to change the (c) portion to
> > list people that have contributed in the site or, at the very least,
> > say that SPI is not the (c) holder.
>
> Listing contributors would be nice.
> It must be done
orde project software is licensed under the GPL, the main
exception being the framework itself which is LGPL. According to the
SVN repository some people were confused and said in README files and
other files that Forwards was GPL.
andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux
On 4/21/06, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:52:47 +1000 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>
> > On 4/21/06, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > How about saying "either first or last lines"?
> > >
> &g
On 4/22/06, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 08:54:48 +1000 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>
> > On 4/21/06, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:52:47 +1000 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > >
> >
r fork+exec) to run non-GPL programs because
> it's a separated work. Why fopen("xxx.png") is not a separated work?
>
>
>
> --
> PaulLiu(Ying-Chun Liu)
> E-mail address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
And
Yes, combine not distribute. Sorry.
andrew
On 4/24/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Of course GPL programs can *open* CC graphics, it's just you cannot
> > *distribute* CC graphics with them if you want to be GPL-
were raised with 2.0 and which are still present in 2.5.
>
> Do you happen to know if there is any time scale for 3.0? I'd really
> like to get started on revamping gnome-themes, but I can't do it unless
> I can distribute the themes under a more appropriate license. If it'
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:54:53 +1000 Andrew Donnellan wrote:
>
> > There is a license called the Free Art license, I don't know if that
> > is DFSG-free.
>
> Here's the text, taken from http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/
>
>
>
> Free Art License
>
eam to release the Word docs!
andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user - http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id
.
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http://l
/06, Max Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The license does not treat software: you cannot value the license on the
basis of Debian Free Software Guidelines. ;-)
However, where can I read that Debian requires *everything*, not just
software, to be DFSG-free??
A link, please.
Max
;-)
Why do we need them?
3. Question: is there a lawyer here??
AFAIK there are some who are occasional contributors. Most of us
aren't lawyers, we're just interested in law.
andrew
Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. PLEASE stop sending HTML.
2. GR-2004-003 changes
tion.
DFSG speak only about software, software and software.
Max
Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/20/06, Max Brown wrote:
> 1. Ok: how? I use "Yahoo! Mail".
Found on http://expita.com/nomime.html:
"If using IE (not available in Netscape and other browse
ut Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux.blogspot.com
Jabber - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Member of Linux Australia - http://linux.org.au
Debian user - http://debian.org
Get free rewards - http:
t. Want a lawyer? Look in the
phone directory and get out the credit card.
Lawyers don't care about freedom, you don't seem to, the rest of
debian-legal does.
I wish mailing lists had moderation like Slashdot.
--
Andrew Donnellan
http://andrewdonnellan.com
http://ajdlinux
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
