On 11/22/05, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These sloppities lend support to the hypothesis that the exception was > not drafted by the FSF's usual license advisors. Is it really FSF > software? >
Don't think so. For two main reasons: 1. GNU doesn't always mean FSF. Most GNU projects are FSF-funded. But some aren't: GNAT was partially funded by the USAF, GNOME has the GNOME Foundation. 2. The wording is terrible. AdaCore is a company, and companies aren't usually all that nice towards GNU/FSF, etc. And, no, I don't think that Adacore has the right to remove the clause. Andrew -- This space for rent. Enquire within. Terms and conditions apply. See store for details. Get free domains - http://www.ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
