By the by, is CC-3.0-BY itself DFSG-free? It is not listed at
http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses but since CC-1.0 is non-DFSG-free,
do I assume that CC-3.0 itself is not free?
I have not inlined or attached the text (nor started a separate thread)
since as OP my main question is not about tha
On 9/6/07, Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the by, is CC-3.0-BY itself DFSG-free? It is not listed at
> http://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses but since CC-1.0 is non-DFSG-free,
> do I assume that CC-3.0 itself is not free?
Other packages licensed under CC-3.0-BY are in main. For e
Le jeudi 06 septembre 2007 à 00:10 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> Hi all,
> I've just found out a real case where section 7b of GNU GPL v3 is
> actually used to impose specific restrictions.
>
> PySoy[1] is a Python library for 3D game development.
> It is released under the terms of the GNU GP
Paul Wise wrote:
Other packages licensed under CC-3.0-BY are in main. For example the
data in the whichwayisup game:
Is there a way to search for this licensewise? Thanks.
S:R)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 06 septembre 2007 à 00:10 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
Hi all,
I've just found out a real case where section 7b of GNU GPL v3 is
actually used to impose specific restrictions.
PySoy[1] is a Python library for 3D game development.
It is released under the term
Dear people *,
I have a question about a license. There's a software, the Monkey's Audio that
has a license [1] a bit peculiar. So, my question is, if one package (GPL)
use this software, has to go to contrib, or could go to main?
Regards,
Leo
* I'm not in the list, so please make a CC to
Le jeudi 06 septembre 2007 à 13:57 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a
écrit :
> Dear people *,
>
> I have a question about a license. There's a software, the Monkey's Audio
> that
> has a license [1] a bit peculiar. So, my question is, if one package (GPL)
> use this software, has to go to con
A Dijous 06 Setembre 2007 14:27, Josselin Mouette va escriure:
> Le jeudi 06 septembre 2007 à 13:57 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a
>
> écrit :
> > Dear people *,
> >
> > I have a question about a license. There's a software, the Monkey's Audio
> > that has a license [1] a bit peculiar. So, my
Le jeudi 06 septembre 2007 à 14:49 +0200, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda a
écrit :
> My question is about a plugin that has in the source the non-free lib but
> itself is gpl, documented all in the License file. and all is a package, has
> to go to non-free? Or the maintainer has to separate in two pa
- Forwarded message from rick -
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 19:15:11 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: :-/
Quoting Trent W. Buck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> See http://bugs.debian.org/354622 for the full story. Sorry I didn't
> include that link before, I was lazy.
As usual for trademark cl
Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the by, is CC-3.0-BY itself DFSG-free? [...]
My understanding is that the project is treating works under CC-3.0-BY
as meeting the DFSG, but the CC-3.0-BY is a confusing licence with many
unresolved questions (lawyerbombs) which I prefer to avoid.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:17:11 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote:
> Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > By the by, is CC-3.0-BY itself DFSG-free? [...]
>
> My understanding is that the project is treating works under CC-3.0-BY
> as meeting the DFSG,
...unfortunately, I should add... :-(
> b
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:23:35 +0530 Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Shriramana, which category does the database you need belong to?
>
> I do not understand which "category" you mean. It's a database of
> latitude/longitude/elevation data for places around the globe. See
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:02:31 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
> I think the authors have completely misunderstood the purpose of
> section 7. This section doesn't allow to add further restrictions, but
> to add further *permissions*. Like, for example, permitting to link
> the program with a li
Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a question about a license. There's a software, the Monkey's
> Audio that has a license [1] a bit peculiar.
For the purpose of context, we prefer the license text be posted in
full in a message in the discussion thread. I've done so i
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For the purpose of context, we prefer the license text be posted in
> full in a message in the discussion thread. I've done so in this
> message.
>
> =
> Monkey's Audio Source Code License Agreement
>
> License Agreement
>
> 1. The Monkey's Audio SDK
Rick,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:25:30AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> > See http://bugs.debian.org/354622 for the full story. Sorry I didn't
> > include that link before, I was lazy.
> As usual for trademark claims, the complainer greatly overstates the
> rights actually available to trademark owne
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:25:30AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
>
> > As usual for trademark claims, the complainer greatly overstates the
> > rights actually available to trademark owners[1]. Briefly stated,
> > establishing a valid trademark entitles yo
Quoting Francesco Poli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[Comparison of DFSG and OSD:]
> OSI based its OSD on the DFSG
More specifically, Bruce Perens wrote the latter document first, and
then copied it wholesale with trivial modifications to create the former
("The license" instead of "The license of a
19 matches
Mail list logo
