On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 12:17:11 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote: > Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By the by, is CC-3.0-BY itself DFSG-free? [...] > > My understanding is that the project is treating works under CC-3.0-BY > as meeting the DFSG,
...unfortunately, I should add... :-( > but the CC-3.0-BY is a confusing licence with > many unresolved questions (lawyerbombs) which I prefer to avoid. IMO, it *fails* to meet the DFSG. But other people (including, apparently, the ftp-masters...) disagree with me. You[1] may take a look at http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00124.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/05/msg00192.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/03/msg00024.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/03/msg00023.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/02/msg00059.html and the threads that followed, for further details. [1] where "You" refers to Shriramana, not to MJ: I am pretty sure that MJ is well aware of those previous discussions! ;-) Ah, the usual disclaimers: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP. -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp8ouBj2iDHD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
