I'm working on packaging a some software that uses this license. Is
this an acceptable license from a debian perspective?
Thanks, -Brian
COPYRIGHT AND LICENCE
Copyright (c) 2005-2006 University of Illinois Board of Trustees
All rights reserved.
Developed by: Campus Information Technologies
Scripsit John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The BCFG public license (below) seems pretty much like a standard BSD
> + advertising clause license. I can't quite seem to remember what the
> current policy on that sort of license is.
We accept them, but grudgingly.
> 7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EX
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
>>UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE FROM THE
>>U.S. GOVERNMENT AND THAT FAILURE TO OBTAIN SUCH EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE
>>MAY RESULT IN CRI
Brian Elliott Finley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on packaging a some software that uses this license. Is
> this an acceptable license from a debian perspective?
Looks like 3-clause BSD, which is absolutely fine.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
"Nathanael Nerode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just a heads-up.
http://gplv3.fsf.org/
There's a lot of complicated wording changes from the first draft of the
GPL v.3.
(They all look like improvements to me, but there's a lot to digest.)
And there's a new dra
Scripsit Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
>>>UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE FROM THE
>>>U.S. GOVERNMENT AND THAT FAILURE TO OBTAIN S
On 7/28/06, Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scripsit Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
>>>UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE FRO
Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 23:36 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> Le ven 28 juillet 2006 23:26, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> > Le vendredi 28 juillet 2006 à 22:40 +0200, Pierre Habouzit a écrit :
> > > > It would be interesting to start a formal enquiry if this applies
> > > > to Bittorrent.
>
versions to play those DVDs. If the work communicates with an online
service, it must be possible for modified versions to communicate with
the same online service in the same way such that the service cannot
distinguish.) A key need not be included in cases where use of the
This is bad for se
"Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>versions to play those DVDs. If the work communicates with an online
service, it must be possible for modified versions to communicate with
the same online service in the same way such that the service cannot
dist
On 7/29/06, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >versions to play those DVDs. If the work communicates with an online
>>service, it must be possible for modified versions to communicate with
>>the same online serv
Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> No, it means that the licensee is obliged to agree that a fact may be
>> true.
>
> And if that fact is not agreeable to me, I may not copy the software?
If you're unwilling to agree to truth statements,
This one time, at band camp, Henning Makholm said:
> Scripsit Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> 7. LICENSEE AGREES THAT THE EXPORT OF GOODS AND/OR TECHNICAL DATA FROM THE
> >>>UNITED STATES MAY REQUIRE SOME FORM OF EXPORT CONTROL LICENSE
Scripsit Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And if that fact is not agreeable to me, I may not copy the software?
> If you're unwilling to agree to truth statements, then yes, I'm entirely
> happy with you not being permitted to copy the software.
"Andrew Donnellan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even moving all logic to the server side can't stop it. Online games
especially need to be able to distinguish the 'official' client from a
modified one. Even if all logic is on the server side, the client
still rece
On 7/29/06, Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The FSF is really not concerned about online games. That is because there is
no way to block draconian DRM restrictions
while aproviding a means to autheniticate an official game client. They
really are the same problem.
The issue is how the GPLv
- Forwarded message from Rakesh 'arky' Ambati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 20:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rakesh 'arky' Ambati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Press Release] Fourth International Conference on GPLv3 (Bangalore)
August 23-24 2006
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Folder: [E
17 matches
Mail list logo
