Re: contrib or main?

2005-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 03:51:23PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 06 décembre 2005 à 18:55 +, Andrew Suffield a écrit : > > main, definitely. There is a thriving community of developers of free > > gameboy games intended to run on these emulators. Don't ask me why, it > > makes no se

Re: contrib or main?

2005-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:44:53PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > It can be applied to just about anything in contrib: "an application that is > nonfunctional without a non-free library doesn't require it, it's just not > very useful without it"; "a Java application doesn't require a JRE, it's > jus

Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-12-09 Thread Simon Josefsson
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You seem to have missed one occurrence of "unauthorized redistributed". > I would suggest suppressing "unauthorized" there... Ah, right. When doing that, I realized we could make it even more readable. Here is the latest updated version: c. The

Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-12-09 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 06:03:00PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I've changed it into: > >Without separate permission, redistributed modified works must (a) >not claim endorsement of the modified work by the IETF, IESG, IANA, >IAB, ISOC, RFC Editor, or any similar organization, and (

Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-12-09 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051209 10:38]: > (b) do not claim endorsement of the modified work by the > Contributor, or any organization the Contributor > belongs to, the Internet Engineering Task Force > (IETF), Internet Re

Re: contrib or main?

2005-12-09 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 09:12:32AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > Please don't fall prey to his rules-lawyering, you really *can't* > reduce this stuff to a set of programmatic rules. Don't worry, we're in full agreement; my examples were only intended to explain why I felt Joe's argument was an

Re: Proposed license for IETF Contributions

2005-12-09 Thread Simon Josefsson
"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051209 10:38]: >> (b) do not claim endorsement of the modified work by the >> Contributor, or any organization the Contributor >> belongs to, the Internet Engineer

pymedia DFSG compliant ?

2005-12-09 Thread Arnaud Fontaine
Hello, Please Cc me because i'm not subscribe on this mailing list. I would like to package pymedia. As i discussed before with Vedran Furac [1], pymedia seems to include ffmpeg library, could someone tell me if this software is DFSG compliant ? Pymedia can also use mp3lame or libfaad2, but it is