Hi,
I'm packaging a set of Glk user interface libraries [1], which are
distributed under a custom license, included below. In my limited
understanding this is both DFSG-free and GPL-compatible, but I'd like
to be sure about this. The libraries are going to be linked against
GPL- and BSD-licensed c
On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 00:40:31 -0500 Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:30:03PM -0600, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
[...]
> > Are you saying it's possible for a developer to release GPL covered
> > software in binary form without releasing the source code as long as
> > he's the copyright
Raul Miller wrote:
On 11/4/05, Lewis Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Tangentially, could someone please clarify this: to pass on the work
dual-licensed, do you need to comply with both licenses, or does the
copyright statement attached to the work that you've legitimately
distributed under
Lewis Jardine wrote:
> what you want to do is distribute it so that whoever received it also
> has the option of choosing GPL or MPL.
>
> If you were to pick either GPL or MPL, and not modify the work, does the
> recipient only have your choice of licence to pick from, or can they
> still choos
Scripsit Lewis Jardine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you were to pick either GPL or MPL, and not modify the work, does
> the recipient only have your choice of licence to pick from, or can
> they still choose either?
They can still choose either. In the case of both the GPL and the MPL
alike, the gran
Scripsit Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 11:30:03PM -0600, Christofer C. Bell wrote:
>> Are you saying it's possible for a developer to release GPL covered
>> software in binary form without releasing the source code as long as
>> he's the copyright holder? That sounds
Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The source code in this package is copyright 1998-9 by Andrew Plotkin. You
> may copy and distribute it freely, by any means and under any conditions,
> as long as the code and documentation is not changed. You may also
> incorporate this code into your ow
"Niko Tyni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1] http://www.eblong.com/zarf/glk/
Ah. Zarf. Quite a fascinating fellow. :)
The source code in this package is copyright 1998-9 by Andrew Plotkin. You
may copy and distribute it freely, by any means and under any condi
Francisco Poli wrote:
>I agree on everything you said, with the following comments/questions:
>
>* why do you suggest repeating everywhere?
Ah. The reason I did that was so that it would be suitable to print out
and have the company lawyers or executives sign.
> I think it
>makes adapting the no
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 06:47:03AM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 11/5/05, Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:28:02PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > > On 11/4/05, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Emmanuel Colbus wrote:
> > > > > My m
10 matches
Mail list logo
